繁體中文
嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」按司逐村列出全縣村莊，本籍之外另立客籍附目——縣志本身亦解釋過原因：嘉慶年間新安縣客籍村莊為數甚多，所以官富巡檢司轄下村莊以外另闢「官富司管屬客籍村莊」這一類目（志錄並有同論）。掃描本第 63 頁上葉右半（版心右側第三欄）就係【官富司管屬客籍村莊 附】標目（掃描本標目末字用通俗寫法，本站正文一律寫「村莊」；「附」以小字附於標目之下）：標目右邊係本籍段最後 14 個村名（苦草洞、清湖墟、良安田、白沙澳、橫塘村、迢逕村、謝坑村、珠園莆、下步村、鹽田寨下、廓下、絲分村、大埔村、大輞仔），標目左邊起係客籍段首二名（莆隔、草莆仔）。本條目核讀第 63 至 65 頁六葉，逐葉點算共 192 個村名——同志錄所記官富司客籍 194 條只差 2 條，即呢六葉基本上就係整份官富司客籍名單；其後第 65 頁下葉即【福永司管屬村莊】標目，屬另一司（志錄記福永司本籍 154 條、客籍 31 條）。六葉之中，可以逐條比定為今香港境內村落嘅，按今日地區分列（名稱一律照掃描本字形抄錄，括號係今名或說明）：沙頭角／打鼓嶺／北區（第 63、64 頁）——麻雀嶺、烏石、萬屋邊、凹下、禾坑、香園、大坑塘、九龍塘、鹽竈下、南涌圍、七木橋、鹿頸、烏蛟田（即烏蛟騰）、荔枝窩、谷埠（即谷埔）、榕樹凹、鎖腦盤（即鎖羅盆）、担水坑、山嘴、蓮麻坑、牛牯角；粉嶺／上水（第 64 頁上葉）——丹竹坑、鶴藪；大埔（第 64 頁上下葉）——碗窰、社山、沙螺洞、大菴、樟樹灘、梧桐寨、大窩；荃灣／葵涌／青衣（第 64 頁下葉）——城門、穿龍（即川龍）、淺灣（即荃灣）、葵涌子（即葵涌）、青衣、油甘頭（即油柑頭）、花山、響石，另有沙田九肚；西貢（第 63 頁上葉、第 64 頁下葉、第 65 頁上葉）——白沙澳、孟公屋、井欄樹、沙角尾、上洋、檳榔灣、爛坭灣、大灣、馬油塘（即馬游塘）、大腦、黃竹山。其餘大量村名屬今深圳、東莞境或一時未能核實（例如六葉所見嘅大望、李萌、大芬、木古、丹竹頭、南嶺子、蓮塘、鹽田寨下、良安田、清湖墟、坪山子、清溪墟、莆草洞等），本站一律唔逐條比定；同名村落兩地皆有嘅（例如「沙田」「長沙灣」「大灣」「白芒」「吉澳」）屬「歧義即棄」，亦唔會逐村指派司屬——縣志只寫村名，冇人口、面積、族姓，本站唔會補。字形未高倍確認嘅一批（大輞仔〔同葉版心兩側各一見，疑其一係西貢「大網仔」〕、莆隔、草莆仔、樟樹莆、平洋、平洋村、風坑、馬尿、烏鑪涌、茅田子、逕下、大林園、朝陽圍、新村、大蟓〔疑「大蠔」〕、橫萌、東鎮皮圍、賴屋山、杯凹、甲蠔洲、蔭口、蕨嶺等）已列入 /coverage 已知缺口，未完成覆核前唔會當香港村落引用。志錄並排對照（六葉村名逐一對得上嘅）：志錄記 1819 年官富司客籍村莊 194 條、本籍 298 條，又記「縣志資料顯示，客籍村落於香港最少有 86 條，蓮麻坑、萬屋邊及九龍塘等均包括在內」——蓮麻坑（第 63 頁上葉）、萬屋邊同九龍塘（第 63 頁下葉）三條正正出現喺本段六葉之內，即志錄講「最少 86 條」嘅原文出處。其餘逐名對得上嘅：麻雀嶺（志錄 1668 年墩台安置寨兵同 1682 年增置輞井、九龍、大埔頭、麻雀嶺四汛條目）、鹿頸、禾坑、谷埔同蓮麻坑（1899 年沙頭角全約五分約同七分約名單）、碗窰（1368 年大埔碗窰鄉、1790 年大埔上碗窰樊仙宮）、梧桐寨（1719 年大埔梧桐寨建村）、大菴（大埔林村大菴風水林）、鶴藪（粉嶺鶴藪谷風水林）、城門（1680 年鄭氏家族遷荃灣城門圍；1821 年屯門汛所轄「蕉逕、大埔頭、城門凹」——本段亦有「蕉逕」）、穿龍即川龍（1730 年成為荃灣古坑、川龍同柴灣角三村建村年份）、淺灣即荃灣（1277 年宋端宗由官富場轉往淺灣；1723 至 1735 年間五族合建淺灣圍即今荃灣老圍）、油甘頭即油柑頭（1685 年荃灣油柑頭村建立）、青衣（1533 年春花洋即今青衣島一帶水域、1596 年新安縣青衣島條目）、井欄樹（1951 年西貢井欄樹村安龍清醮）、沙角尾（2001 年西貢沙角尾臨時房屋區拆卸——香港最後一個）、上洋同孟公屋（1955 年西貢六村名單）、烏蛟騰（1913 年樹林護理區）、荔枝窩（1950 年代全盛期）、鎖羅盆（客家年三十習俗條目）、白沙澳（保存狀況較理想嘅歷史聚落）、九肚（1997 年沙田九肚山）。1819 年之後嘅志錄條目一律標明係「其後發展」。
English
The Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer lists the county’s villages one by one in juan 2, “Villages”, grouped by the office that administered them, with Hakka villages given as a separate appended category — the gazetteer itself explains why: Hakka villages were so numerous under the Jiaqing reign that a category of “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office” was opened beside the villages of the Guanfu inspectorate, and the archive carries the same explanation. The heading 【官富司管屬客籍村莊 附】 stands in the right half of the upper leaf of page 63 of the scan (the third column to the right of the running head; the scan prints a popular form of the last character, rendered here as 村莊 throughout, and gives 附 in small type beneath the heading): to its right stand the last fourteen names of the indigenous stretch (苦草洞, 清湖墟, 良安田, 白沙澳, 橫塘村, 迢逕村, 謝坑村, 珠園莆, 下步村, 鹽田寨下, 廓下, 絲分村, 大埔村 and 大輞仔) and to its left the first two of the Hakka stretch (莆隔 and 草莆仔). This entry covers the six leaves of pages 63 to 65, counted leaf by leaf: 192 village names — two short of the 194 Hakka villages the archive records under the Guanfu Office, so these six leaves are in effect the whole of that list. Immediately afterwards, on the lower leaf of page 65, the heading “Villages under the Fuyong Office” opens another office’s list (154 indigenous and 31 Hakka villages in the archive’s reckoning). Among the six leaves, the names that can be identified as villages inside Hong Kong today are, grouped by present-day district (all names are given as the scan prints them, with the modern name or a note in brackets): Sha Tau Kok, Ta Kwu Ling and the North District (pages 63 and 64) — 麻雀嶺, 烏石, 萬屋邊, 凹下, 禾坑, 香園, 大坑塘, 九龍塘, 鹽竈下, 南涌圍, 七木橋, 鹿頸, 烏蛟田 (today 烏蛟騰), 荔枝窩, 谷埠 (today 谷埔), 榕樹凹, 鎖腦盤 (today 鎖羅盆), 担水坑, 山嘴, 蓮麻坑 and 牛牯角; Fanling and Sheung Shui (upper leaf of page 64) — 丹竹坑 and 鶴藪; Tai Po (both leaves of page 64) — 碗窰, 社山, 沙螺洞, 大菴, 樟樹灘, 梧桐寨 and 大窩; Tsuen Wan, Kwai Chung and Tsing Yi (lower leaf of page 64) — 城門, 穿龍 (today 川龍), 淺灣 (today 荃灣), 葵涌子 (today 葵涌), 青衣, 油甘頭 (today 油柑頭), 花山 and 響石, with 九肚 in Sha Tin; and Sai Kung (upper leaf of page 63, lower leaf of page 64 and upper leaf of page 65) — 白沙澳, 孟公屋, 井欄樹, 沙角尾, 上洋, 檳榔灣, 爛坭灣, 大灣, 馬油塘 (today 馬游塘), 大腦 and 黃竹山. Many of the remaining names stand in what is Shenzhen or Dongguan today, or have not been checked one by one (among them 大望, 李萌, 大芬, 木古, 丹竹頭, 南嶺子, 蓮塘, 鹽田寨下, 良安田, 清湖墟, 坪山子, 清溪墟 and 莆草洞), and no place is assigned to them; where a name exists on both sides of the border (for instance 沙田, 長沙灣, 大灣, 白芒 and 吉澳) it is dropped rather than guessed, and no village is assigned to an office by this site — the gazetteer gives names only, with no population, area or lineage, and none is supplied here. A further set of names whose glyphs could not be confirmed at high magnification (大輞仔, which appears once on each side of the running head of the same leaf, one of them perhaps the Sai Kung 大網仔; 莆隔, 草莆仔, 樟樹莆, 平洋, 平洋村, 風坑, 馬尿, 烏鑪涌, 茅田子, 逕下, 大林園, 朝陽圍, 新村, 大蟓 (perhaps 大蠔), 橫萌, 東鎮皮圍, 賴屋山, 杯凹, 甲蠔洲, 蔭口 and 蕨嶺) is listed in the known gaps on /coverage and is not cited as a Hong Kong village until checked. The archive sits alongside the reading: it records 194 Hakka and 298 indigenous villages under the Guanfu Office for 1819, and states that “county gazetteer records show at least 86 Hakka villages in Hong Kong, including Lin Ma Hang, Man Uk Pin and Kowloon Tong” — 蓮麻坑 (upper leaf of page 63) and 萬屋邊 with 九龍塘 (lower leaf of page 63) all stand on these six leaves, so the gazetteer behind that archive statement is the text read here. Other names matched one by one: 麻雀嶺 (the archive’s 1668 entry on garrisons placed at Tapu Tau, 麻雀嶺, 獅子嶺 and Tuen Mun, and its 1682 entry adding the 輞井, Kowloon, Tapu Tau and Ma Tseuk Leng stations), 鹿頸, 禾坑, 谷埔 and 蓮麻坑 (the 1899 five- and seven-sub-alliance lists for the Sha Tau Kok main alliance), 碗窰 (the Tai Po 碗窰 village of 1368 and the Fan Sin temple at Upper Wun Yiu in 1790), 梧桐寨 (a Tai Po village founded in 1719), 大菴 (the Tai Po Lam Tsuen fung shui wood), 鶴藪 (the Fanling valley wood), 城門 (the Zheng family settling at Tsuen Wan’s Shing Mun Wai in 1680, and the Tuen Mun station’s 1821 sub-stations, which include 蕉逕, Tapu Tau and 城門凹 — the same leaf also carrying 蕉逕), 穿龍 (the 1730 founding year of Tsuen Wan’s 古坑, 川龍 and 柴灣角 villages), 淺灣 (the Song court moving from Guanfu Chang to 淺灣 in 1277, and the five clans building 淺灣圍, today’s Tsuen Wan Old Wai, between 1723 and 1735), 油甘頭 (Tsuen Wan’s 油柑頭 village, founded in 1685), 青衣 (the 1533 sea fight off 春花洋 by today’s Tsing Yi and the 1596 entry on Tsing Yi Island), 井欄樹 (a 1951 jiao held at the Sai Kung village), 沙角尾 (the demolition of Sai Kung’s 沙角尾 temporary housing area in 2001, Hong Kong’s last), 上洋 and 孟公屋 (the 1955 list of six Sai Kung villages), 烏蛟騰 (gazetted as a plantation care area in 1913), 荔枝窩 (its 1950s heyday), 鎖羅盆 (a Hakka New Year’s Eve custom), 白沙澳 (a historic settlement in relatively good repair) and 九肚 (the 1997 Sha Tin landslide). Archive entries later than 1819 are all marked as later development.
出處：掃描本：《廣州大典》第三十五輯·史部方志類·第六十三冊，嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」——「官富司管屬客籍村莊 附」段，掃描本第 63、64、65 頁共六葉（每頁上下兩葉；版心逐葉實測題「新安縣志 卷之二 都里」，頁次係行草字形、未能高倍確認，按次序推定七至十二，承接第 62 頁上下兩葉嘅五、六；同段之後，第 65 頁下葉再見「福永司管屬村莊」標目）；Commons sha1 ad357f97…。掃描本冇可用文字層，內容一律人手核讀（以裁圖工具做全葉裁圖＋高倍局部圖，唔用 OCR）：見 scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift。Provenance: Scan: Guangzhou Dadian, series 35 (local gazetteers), volume 63 — the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”: the section headed “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” (scan pages 63, 64 and 65, six leaves in all, two to a page; each leaf’s running head was read directly as “Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, Villages”, its folio numeral being cursive and not confirmable at high magnification, so folios 7 to 12 are given by sequence, following folios 5 and 6 on the two leaves of page 62; the heading “Villages under the Fuyong Office” then stands on the lower leaf of page 65); Commons sha1 ad357f97…. The scan has no usable text layer, so its content is read by hand (full-leaf crops plus high-magnification details, 裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）): see scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift.