繁體中文
嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」嘅【官富司管屬村莊】（本籍）段，批次 M7 讀咗第 59 頁上下兩葉，本批續讀三葉：掃描本第 60 頁上下兩葉同第 61 頁下葉。三葉版心逐葉實測都係「新安縣志／卷之二／都里」，葉內冇再出現任何標目，所以三葉都仲屬官富司本籍段，一路延續到第 63 頁上葉【官富司管屬客籍村莊 附】標目之前。讀法照舊：一個掃描頁＝上下兩葉，葉內右半先讀、左半後讀（跨過版心續讀），同一欄由上而下兩個村名；三葉逐葉點算——第 60 頁上葉右半 10 欄 20 名、左半 9 欄 18 名；第 60 頁下葉兩半各 9 欄 18＋18 名；第 61 頁下葉兩半各 9 欄 18＋18 名，合共 110 名。第 60 頁上葉右半 20 名（由右至左、每欄由上而下）：塘福村、石頭莆、石甲門、二澳村、平洲灣、青龍頭、水口村、由古蓢、龍躍頭、河上鄉、金錢村、燕岡村、丙岡圍、孔嶺村、上水村、莆上村、嶺下村、隔田村、永安村、橋邊莆；左半 18 名：粉壁嶺、松柏蓢、古洞村、大嶺下、石湖墟、洲頭村、新田村、張屋村、唐公嶺、長瀝村、官涌村、米歩村、軍地村、黎峒村、丹竹坑、泰亨村、大歩頭、交屋村。可辨認者：右半前四欄係大嶼山同日後荃灣一帶（塘福村、石頭莆、石甲門〔疑即石門甲〕、二澳村、平洲灣、青龍頭、水口村），後六欄係北區（龍躍頭、河上鄉、金錢村、燕岡村〔今燕崗〕、丙岡圍〔今丙崗〕、孔嶺村、上水村、莆上村、嶺下村、隔田村、永安村、橋邊莆）；左半十八名盡係北區同新界北（粉壁嶺〔今粉嶺〕、松柏蓢〔今松柏塱〕、古洞村、大嶺下、石湖墟、洲頭村、新田村、張屋村、唐公嶺、長瀝村、官涌村、米歩村〔今米埔；縣志印「歩」，本站照錄〕、軍地村、黎峒村〔今萊洞〕、丹竹坑、泰亨村、大歩頭〔今大埔頭〕、交屋村）。第 60 頁下葉右半 18 名：大歩墟（即大埔墟）、大陳屋、大黃屋、南坑村、豐園村、塘坑村、漣涌村、圓頭村、鍾屋村、塘面村、新屋村、隆興村、烏溪沙、樟木頭、西澳村、田寮村、井頭、大洞村；左半 18 名：官坑村、上下輋、西逕村、榕樹澳、馬牯纜、沙角尾、黃竹洋、北港村、蠔涌村、窖塘村、大浪村、北潭村、赤逕村、樟上村、馬鞍山、菱香逕、大灣村、仰窩村。可辨認者：上葉最左一欄（大歩頭、交屋村）之後，下葉續大埔（大歩墟、大陳屋、大黃屋、南坑村、塘坑村、塘面村、鍾屋村），轉沙田、馬鞍山一帶（烏溪沙、西澳村、井頭、大洞村、田寮村、新屋村、隆興村），左半盡係西貢（官坑村、西逕村〔今西徑〕、榕樹澳、馬牯纜、沙角尾、黃竹洋、北港村、蠔涌村、大浪村、北潭村、赤逕村〔今赤徑〕、大灣村、仰窩村）同過渡幾欄（上下輋、樟上村、馬鞍山）。「大黃屋」「大陳屋」兩個名之前各有一個小字「窩」（照掃描本字形錄；小字係圖／約名前綴抑或村名嘅一部分，未經覆核唔會斷定）。第 61 頁下葉右半 18 名：福興圍、葉屋村、曹屋圍、清慶村、田心村、隔塘村、田貝村、塋下墩、向東村、錦興村、赤尾村、陳屋圍、筆架山、慶田村、澗頭圍、鳳凰湖、迴田村、李屋村；左半 18 名：平源村、大莆田、山雞蔞、塘坊村、土狗莆、羅坊村、松園下、凹下村、橫岡下、木湖圍、赤水洞、大逕村、牛角山、馬公塘、南岸村、蔭貝村、新屋邊、泥岡村。呢兩半嘅可辨認村名已經遠離香港境：赤尾村、田貝村、隔塘村、泥岡村、羅坊村、筆架山、鳳凰湖、田心村同今日深圳羅湖、福田一帶舊村名相同（按站規只並列，唔逐條斷定今址），同批次 M4「第 61 頁下葉屬深圳方向」嘅觀察一致。官富司本籍段逐葉累計：第 59 頁 68＋第 60 頁 74＋第 61 頁下 36＝178 名；第 61 頁上同第 62 頁上下三葉批次 M4 已入庫但未逐葉點算，整段係唔係同志錄記嘅官富司本籍 298 條（EV-18190000-19）對得上，留待下一批逐葉覆核（批次 M10 已補齊：餘下第 61 上、第 62 上下六頁逐葉各 36 名，全段逐葉 300 名對志錄 298 條差 2、同司客籍 −2 相抵、合計 492 ✓，見批次 M10 條目）。志錄並排：官富司本籍 298 條、客籍 194 條（EV-18190000-19），全縣本籍 579、客籍 275（EV-18190000-18），同年官富巡檢司管轄香港地區大部分範圍、東平洲除外（EV-18190000-06／07）。呢批村名一律「照掃描本字形抄錄」：唔逐村指派司屬、唔逐條比定今址、唔當統計數字，亦唔會因為同名就當係今日同一條村。字形未高倍確認嘅一批（石甲門〔疑石門甲〕、由古蓢〔末字形近「蓢」／「萌」未定〕、漣涌村、圓頭村、窖塘村、樟上村、菱香逕、仰窩村、塋下墩、澗頭圍、山雞蔞、蔭貝村、土狗莆、清慶村、平源村、迴田村）已列入 /coverage 已知缺口，未完成覆核前唔會當作已核實村名引用。另外，本批第 60 頁上葉「松柏蓢」嘅末字喺超高倍局部圖確認係「蓢」（艹＋朗）——同形字就係 M7 記作〔元萌〕嘅欄首小字圖名前綴，疑即〔元蓢〕，M7 條目嘅未確認標記保留唔改。
English
The Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer lists its villages office by office in juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”. Batch M7 covered the two leaves of page 59 that carry the heading “Villages under the Guanfu Office”; this batch reads the next three leaves of that indigenous Guanfu list — both leaves of page 60 and the lower leaf of page 61 of the scan. Each leaf’s running head was read directly as “Xin’an County Gazetteer / juan 2 / Villages”, no further heading appears on these leaves, and so all three still belong to the indigenous Guanfu list, running on to the heading “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” on the upper leaf of page 63. The reading order is as always: one scan page holds two leaves, each leaf is read right half first and left half second (reading on across the running head), and each printed column is read downwards through its two village names. By leaf: the upper leaf of page 60 holds ten columns of two names in its right half (twenty names) and nine columns in its left half (eighteen), the lower leaf of page 60 eighteen names to each half, and the lower leaf of page 61 eighteen names to each half — 110 names in all. Upper leaf of page 60, right half, twenty names read right to left and downwards within each column: 塘福村, 石頭莆, 石甲門, 二澳村, 平洲灣, 青龍頭, 水口村, 由古蓢, 龍躍頭, 河上鄉, 金錢村, 燕岡村, 丙岡圍, 孔嶺村, 上水村, 莆上村, 嶺下村, 隔田村, 永安村 and 橋邊莆; left half, eighteen: 粉壁嶺, 松柏蓢, 古洞村, 大嶺下, 石湖墟, 洲頭村, 新田村, 張屋村, 唐公嶺, 長瀝村, 官涌村, 米歩村, 軍地村, 黎峒村, 丹竹坑, 泰亨村, 大歩頭 and 交屋村. Every identifiable name in the right half’s first four columns lies on Lantau or in what is now Tsuen Wan (塘福村, 石頭莆, 石甲門 — probably 石門甲 — 二澳村, 平洲灣, 青龍頭 and 水口村), while its last six columns are North District villages (龍躍頭, 河上鄉, 金錢村, 燕岡村 — now 燕崗 — 丙岡圍 — now 丙崗 — 孔嶺村, 上水村, 莆上村, 嶺下村, 隔田村, 永安村 and 橋邊莆); the whole left half is the North District and the northern New Territories (粉壁嶺 — now 粉嶺 — 松柏蓢 — now 松柏塱 — 古洞村, 大嶺下, 石湖墟, 洲頭村, 新田村, 張屋村, 唐公嶺, 長瀝村, 官涌村, 米歩村 — now 米埔, printed 歩 and transcribed as such — 軍地村, 黎峒村 — now 萊洞 — 丹竹坑, 泰亨村, 大歩頭 — now 大埔頭 — and 交屋村).Lower leaf of page 60, right half, eighteen names: 大歩墟 (Tai Po Market), 大陳屋, 大黃屋, 南坑村, 豐園村, 塘坑村, 漣涌村, 圓頭村, 鍾屋村, 塘面村, 新屋村, 隆興村, 烏溪沙, 樟木頭, 西澳村, 田寮村, 井頭 and 大洞村; left half, eighteen: 官坑村, 上下輋, 西逕村, 榕樹澳, 馬牯纜, 沙角尾, 黃竹洋, 北港村, 蠔涌村, 窖塘村, 大浪村, 北潭村, 赤逕村, 樟上村, 馬鞍山, 菱香逕, 大灣村 and 仰窩村. After the leftmost column of the upper leaf (大歩頭 and 交屋村) the list continues in Tai Po (大歩墟, 大陳屋, 大黃屋, 南坑村, 塘坑村, 塘面村 and 鍾屋村), turns to Sha Tin and Ma On Shan (烏溪沙, 西澳村, 井頭, 大洞村, 田寮村, 新屋村 and 隆興村), and its left half is wholly Sai Kung (官坑村, 西逕村 — now 西徑 — 榕樹澳, 馬牯纜, 沙角尾, 黃竹洋, 北港村, 蠔涌村, 大浪村, 北潭村, 赤逕村 — now 赤徑 — 大灣村 and 仰窩村) with a few transitional columns (上下輋, 樟上村 and 馬鞍山). The names 大黃屋 and 大陳屋 each stand behind a small-type 窩 (transcribed as printed; whether the small character is a map or covenant prefix or part of the village name is not asserted before review). Lower leaf of page 61, right half, eighteen names: 福興圍, 葉屋村, 曹屋圍, 清慶村, 田心村, 隔塘村, 田貝村, 塋下墩, 向東村, 錦興村, 赤尾村, 陳屋圍, 筆架山, 慶田村, 澗頭圍, 鳳凰湖, 迴田村 and 李屋村; left half, eighteen: 平源村, 大莆田, 山雞蔞, 塘坊村, 土狗莆, 羅坊村, 松園下, 凹下村, 橫岡下, 木湖圍, 赤水洞, 大逕村, 牛角山, 馬公塘, 南岸村, 蔭貝村, 新屋邊 and 泥岡村. Its identifiable names lie well beyond Hong Kong: 赤尾村, 田貝村, 隔塘村, 泥岡村, 羅坊村, 筆架山, 鳳凰湖 and 田心村 match old villages in what is now Shenzhen’s Luohu and Futian districts (juxtaposed only, as this site’s rule requires), agreeing with batch M4’s observation that the lower leaf of page 61 points towards Shenzhen. Running count for the indigenous Guanfu list: 68 on page 59 plus 74 on page 60 plus 36 on the lower leaf of page 61 = 178 names; the upper leaf of page 61 and both leaves of page 62 entered the archive in batch M4 but were not counted leaf by leaf, and the tally against the 298 indigenous Guanfu villages the archive records (EV-18190000-19) was completed in batch M10 (the remaining pages, thirty-six names to the page, bring the stretch to 300 names against the archive’s 298, the excess cancelling the office’s two-name Hakka shortfall). For comparison the archive records 298 indigenous and 194 Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office (EV-18190000-19) and 579 indigenous and 275 Hakka in the county (EV-18190000-18), with the Guanfu naval patrol covering most of the Hong Kong region but not Tung Ping Chau in the same year (EV-18190000-06／07). Every name here is transcribed as printed: no office is assigned to any individual village, no village is identified with a modern address, none of this is treated as statistics, and a shared name is never assumed to be the same village. A list of characters not confirmed at high magnification (石甲門, the last character of 由古蓢, 漣涌村, 圓頭村, 窖塘村, 樟上村, 菱香逕, 仰窩村, 塋下墩, 澗頭圍, 山雞蔞, 蔭貝村, 土狗莆, 清慶村, 平源村 and 迴田村) has been added to the known gaps on /coverage. In the same run the last character of 松柏蓢 on the upper leaf of page 60 was confirmed at very high magnification to be 蓢 (艹 with 朗); the same character is the small-type map name at the head of a column that batch M7 read as 元萌, which is therefore very probably 元蓢, M7’s unconfirmed marking being left as it stands.
出處：掃描本：《廣州大典》第三十五輯·史部方志類·第六十三冊，嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」——【官富司管屬村莊】（本籍段）嘅續三葉：掃描本第 60 頁上下兩葉同第 61 頁下葉（上接第 59 頁官富司本籍段標目兩葉，下接第 63 頁上葉【官富司管屬客籍村莊 附】標目之前）；版心逐葉實測題「新安縣志／卷之二／都里」（魚尾之下為卷次，再下為篇名「都里」），版心下半另有一個行草字形（形近「靑」或「青」）、未能高倍確認，所以唔填頁次；Commons sha1 ad357f97…。掃描本冇可用文字層，內容一律人手核讀（裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）：全葉裁圖 1400、左右半葉放大圖 1500–1700、單欄超高倍局部圖 900–1000）：見 scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift。Provenance: Scan: Guangzhou Dadian, series 35 (local gazetteers), volume 63 — the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”: three further leaves of the section headed “Villages under the Guanfu Office” (the indigenous Guanfu list) — both leaves of page 60 of the scan and the lower leaf of page 61, following the two leaves of page 59 that carry the heading and preceding the heading “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” on the upper leaf of page 63. Each leaf’s running head was read directly as “Xin’an County Gazetteer / juan 2 / Villages” (the juan number below the fishtail ornament, the section title below that), with a cursive character lower in the running head (shaped like 靑 or 青) that could not be confirmed at high magnification, so no folio number is given; Commons sha1 ad357f97…. The scan has no usable text layer, so its content is read by hand (whole-leaf crops at 1400 px, half-leaf details at 1500–1700 px and single-column details at 900–1000 px, 裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）): see scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift.