繁體中文
嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」逐司列出村莊名單。本條係【官富司管屬村莊】——即官富司本籍段——嘅開頭兩葉：掃描本第 59 頁上葉右半、由右數第 2 欄就係【官富司管屬村莊】標目（掃描本標目末字同部分村名用通俗寫法，本站正文一律寫繁體「村莊」），標目右手邊嘅一欄兩個村名（新圍、深水田）屬上一段、唔會算入官富司（同批次 M6 處理「福永司管屬客籍村莊 附」標目旁邊村名嘅做法一致）。呢個標目亦印證咗批次 M4／M5 由「官富司管屬客籍村莊 附」段反推嘅結論：掃描本第 61、62 頁各葉確屬官富司本籍段。標目之後嘅村名，上葉右半 14 個（錦田村、屏山村、香元圍、廈尾村、廈川村、長岡村、新隆村、新圍村、錫降圍、錫降村、東頭村、屯門村、西山村、輞川村），上葉左半 18 個（高莆圍、英龍圍、石岡圍、石湖塘、圓岡村、上村村、合山圍、東安圍、墪頭圍、沙莆圍、李屋、西邊圍、福田村、青磚圍、東皋村、南邊圍、福安村、山背村）；其中一批村名嘅欄首另以小字標出圖名（讀作〔屏山〕〔元萌〕），另有一欄欄首小字讀作「竹」、其下村名未能確認，全部照錄並列缺口。第 59 頁下葉兩半各 9 欄、每欄上下兩個村名，共 36 個（水邊圍、水邊村、馬田村、欖口村、田寮村、木橋頭、深涌村、白沙村、田心圍、大塘村、山下村、港頭村、大橋村、〔石步〕李屋村、〔石步〕林屋村、東新村、張屋村、大井村、橫洲村、蚶蛇鬱、沙岡村、鱟田村、隔田村、廣田村、鴉柏嶺、新豐圍、子屯圍村、莆塘下、小坑村、中心巷、袁家園、石榴坑、梅窩村、牛凹村、石壁村、沙螺灣）。兩葉合共讀出 70 個村名（官富司段 68 個，另加標目之前屬上一段嘅 2 個），讀法照舊：一個掃描頁＝上下兩葉、葉內右半先讀、同一欄由上而下。官富司本籍段續見掃描本第 60 至 62 頁各葉，整段逐葉點算（志錄記官富司本籍 298 條）留待餘下各葉讀完。地理上，可辨認嘅村名集中喺今日三處——元朗、屏山、屯門一帶（錦田村、屏山村、廈川村、長岡村、新隆村、新圍村、錫降圍、錫降村、東頭村、西山村、輞川村、大井村、水邊圍、水邊村、馬田村、欖口村、木橋頭、大橋村、山下村、田心圍、深涌村、田寮村、白沙村、大塘村、港頭村、石步李屋村、石步林屋村、東新村、張屋村、橫洲村、沙岡村、小坑村、袁家園、隔田村、莆塘下）同大嶼山（沙螺灣、石壁村、梅窩村、牛凹村）；呢個正係批次 M6 否定「新界西嘅村名喺福永司段」之後嘅落腳點。照站規，所有村名一律寫成「照掃描本字形抄錄」：同名村落兩地皆有（元朗同深圳都有白沙村、田心村一類），所以本站唔逐村指派司屬、唔逐條比定今址、唔當統計數字，亦唔會因為「今元朗有水邊圍」就當係同一條村。志錄並排對照：《香港志》志錄記 1819 年官富司所轄村莊本籍 298 條、客籍 194 條（EV-18190000-19），全縣本籍 579、客籍 275（EV-18190000-18），即全縣 854 條村落裏官富司佔 492 條、其中大約三分之二處於香港地域之內（EV-18190000-34）；同年官富巡檢司管轄香港地區大部分範圍、東平洲除外（EV-18190000-06／07）。志錄另記 1819 年香港境內四個墟市，其中圓朗墟由大橋墩墟遷移而來、即今元朗舊墟（EV-18190000-21）——本葉下葉見「大橋村」，兩者可能相關，但未有其他證據前只並排、唔斷定。大嶼山方面，志錄記 1819 年已有大嶼山汛同東涌口汛（EV-18190000-33），本葉嘅沙螺灣、石壁村、梅窩村、牛凹村同此可以並讀，同樣唔會由並排變成斷定。字形未完全高倍確認嘅一批（墪頭圍、欄首小字「竹」一欄嘅村名、蚶蛇鬱、鱟田村、鴉柏嶺、梅窩村、莆塘下、中心巷）已列入 /coverage 已知缺口。
English
The Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer lists its villages office by office in juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”. This entry covers the opening two leaves of the “Villages under the Guanfu Office” section — the indigenous Guanfu list: on the upper leaf of page 59 of the scan, the second column from the right carries the heading “Villages under the Guanfu Office” (the scan prints the last character of headings and of some village names in the popular form; this site always writes the traditional 村莊), and the single column of two names to the right of the heading (新圍 and 深水田) belongs to the preceding stretch and is not counted as Guanfu villages, exactly as was done for the names standing beside the Fuyong Hakka heading in batch M6. The heading also confirms the inference batches M4 and M5 drew back from the “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” section: the leaves on pages 61 and 62 of the scan do belong to the indigenous Guanfu list. After the heading the upper leaf’s right half carries fourteen names (錦田村, 屏山村, 香元圍, 廈尾村, 廈川村, 長岡村, 新隆村, 新圍村, 錫降圍, 錫降村, 東頭村, 屯門村, 西山村 and 輞川村) and its left half eighteen (高莆圍, 英龍圍, 石岡圍, 石湖塘, 圓岡村, 上村村, 合山圍, 東安圍, 墪頭圍, 沙莆圍, 李屋, 西邊圍, 福田村, 青磚圍, 東皋村, 南邊圍, 福安村 and 山背村); several of those names stand under a small-type map name at the head of the column (read as 屏山 and 元萌), and one column carries a small 竹 whose village name could not be confirmed, all transcribed as printed and listed among the gaps. The lower leaf of page 59 holds nine columns to each half, two names to a column, thirty-six names in all (水邊圍, 水邊村, 馬田村, 欖口村, 田寮村, 木橋頭, 深涌村, 白沙村, 田心圍, 大塘村, 山下村, 港頭村, 大橋村, 石步李屋村, 石步林屋村, 東新村, 張屋村, 大井村, 橫洲村, 蚶蛇鬱, 沙岡村, 鱟田村, 隔田村, 廣田村, 鴉柏嶺, 新豐圍, 子屯圍村, 莆塘下, 小坑村, 中心巷, 袁家園, 石榴坑, 梅窩村, 牛凹村, 石壁村 and 沙螺灣). The two leaves thus yield seventy names in all — sixty-eight of the Guanfu list plus the two belonging to the preceding stretch — read as always: one scan page holds two leaves, each leaf is read right half first, and each column downwards. The indigenous Guanfu list runs on across pages 60 to 62 of the scan, so the leaf-by-leaf tally for the whole section (298 villages in the archive) waits on the remaining leaves. Geographically every identifiable name lies in three areas of Hong Kong today: Yuen Long, Ping Shan and Tuen Mun (錦田村, 屏山村, 廈川村, 長岡村, 新隆村, 新圍村, 錫降圍, 錫降村, 東頭村, 西山村, 輞川村, 大井村, 水邊圍, 水邊村, 馬田村, 欖口村, 木橋頭, 大橋村, 山下村, 田心圍, 深涌村, 田寮村, 白沙村, 大塘村, 港頭村, 石步李屋村, 石步林屋村, 東新村, 張屋村, 橫洲村, 沙岡村, 小坑村, 袁家園, 隔田村 and 莆塘下) and Lantau (沙螺灣, 石壁村, 梅窩村 and 牛凹村) — the ground batch M6 pointed to once it had shown that the villages of the western New Territories are not in the Fuyong section. As the site’s rule requires, every name is given “as the scan prints it”: like-named villages exist on both sides of the border (Yuen Long and Shenzhen each have a 白沙村 and a 田心村), so no village is assigned to an office, none is pinned to a modern site and none becomes a statistic — nor is a name equated with a present-day place merely because Yuen Long has a 水邊圍 today. The Chronicles archive sits alongside: it records 298 indigenous and 194 Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office in 1819 (EV-18190000-19), 579 indigenous and 275 Hakka for the whole county (EV-18190000-18), so that 492 of the county’s 854 villages fell to the Guanfu Office, about two-thirds of them inside Hong Kong territory (EV-18190000-34); the archive also states that the office then administered most of the Hong Kong region, Tung Ping Chau excepted (EV-18190000-06/07). It further lists the four market towns inside Hong Kong in 1819, of which Yuen Long market was moved from Tai Kiu Tun market and is today’s Yuen Long old market (EV-18190000-21) — the lower leaf read here carries a 大橋村, and the two may be related, but without further evidence they are merely set side by side and never equated. On Lantau the archive records a Lantau station and a Tung Chung Hau station by 1819 (EV-18190000-33), which can be read alongside the 沙螺灣, 石壁村, 梅窩村 and 牛凹村 of this leaf, again without turning juxtaposition into identification. Names whose glyphs could not be fully confirmed at high magnification (墪頭圍, the village under the small 竹, 蚶蛇鬱, 鱟田村, 鴉柏嶺, 梅窩村, 莆塘下 and 中心巷) are listed among the known gaps on /coverage.
出處：掃描本：《廣州大典》第三十五輯·史部方志類·第六十三冊，嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」——【官富司管屬村莊】標目同其後兩葉（即官富司本籍段嘅開頭），掃描本第 59 頁上下兩葉；版心逐葉實測題「新安縣志／卷之二／都里」，版心下半另有一個行草字形（形近「克」或「手」）、未能高倍確認，所以唔填頁次；Commons sha1 ad357f97…。掃描本冇可用文字層，內容一律人手核讀（裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）：全頁圖、左右半葉放大圖、窄條放大圖，闊 1600–1700 px）：見 scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift。Provenance: Scan: Guangzhou Dadian, series 35 (local gazetteers), volume 63 — the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”: the heading “Villages under the Guanfu Office” and the two leaves that follow it, where the indigenous Guanfu list begins, being both leaves of page 59 of the scan. Each leaf’s running head was read directly as “Xin’an County Gazetteer / juan 2 / Villages”, with a cursive character below it (shaped like 克 or 手) that could not be confirmed at high magnification, so no folio number is given; Commons sha1 ad357f97…. The scan has no usable text layer, so its content is read by hand (whole-page, half-leaf and narrow-strip magnified crops at 1600–1700 px, 裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）): see scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift.