Fact · trees · 2026-10-10

Old and Valuable Trees registered (approx.)

古樹名木冊收錄樹木(約)

Figure and reference date

about 500 trees

約 500 棵

Data as at
Source
Greening: Register of Old and Valuable Trees and Tree Register
Publisher
Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section, Development Bureau
Fact ID
trees-ovt-count
Last checked

Notes and definition

Since 2004 the Government has registered Old and Valuable Trees on unleased government land; the number is about 500.

Other figures in this group (trees)

Figures in the same group are not necessarily additive — check the basis note above first. Trees and greening.

Item / 項目Figure / 數字As of / 時點Source / 來源
Year the OVT Register was set up
古樹名木冊設立年份
2004 (Register) / 2010 (Tree Register)
2004 年(名冊)/2010 年(樹木登記冊)
The Register of OVTs began in 2004; the Tree Register covering OVTs and stone-wall trees has operated since July 2010.
2026-10-10Greening: Register of Old and Valuable Trees and Tree Register

Other figures from the same official source

These figures come from the same registered document: “Greening: Register of Old and Valuable Trees and Tree Register” (Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section, Development Bureau). Being in one document does not make them additive.

Item / 項目Figure / 數字As of / 時點Source / 來源
Year the OVT Register was set up
古樹名木冊設立年份
2004 (Register) / 2010 (Tree Register)
2004 年(名冊)/2010 年(樹木登記冊)
The Register of OVTs began in 2004; the Tree Register covering OVTs and stone-wall trees has operated since July 2010.
2026-10-10Greening: Register of Old and Valuable Trees and Tree Register

How to cite this figure

Hong Kong Story, “Old and Valuable Trees registered (approx.)”, https://hongkongstory.org/en/facts/trees-ovt-count, data as at 2026-10-10 (retrieved _).

中文:香港紀事館,〈古樹名木冊收錄樹木(約)〉,https://hongkongstory.org/facts/trees-ovt-count,資料時點 2026-10-10(查閱日期 _)。

Machine-readable: /api/v1/facts.json (id = trees-ovt-count) · OpenAPI 3.1 ·/llms.txt

Registered source

This site is a secondary compilation: the official text prevails. If the figure above differs from the official document, the official document is correct.

↑