繁體中文
嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」逐司列出村莊名單，四個司屬（官富司、福永司、縣丞、典史）各分「本籍」同「客籍（附）」兩段。批次 M7／M8 由第 59 頁讀到官富司本籍段開頭，但第 58 頁之前嘅三個分段標目一直未有定位，四司界線只能靠志錄數字反推。本批（M9）連讀掃描本第 57、58 頁上下四葉，正好補上呢個缺口：第 57 頁上葉左半有【典史管屬客籍村莊 附】標目、第 57 頁下葉右半有【縣丞管屬村莊】標目、第 58 頁上葉左半有【縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附】標目；加上第 59 頁上葉嘅【官富司管屬村莊】標目（批次 M7 已讀），四司各段嘅起點全部定位（掃描本標目末字用通俗寫法，本站正文一律寫繁體「村莊」）。標目規矩照批次 M6／M7 定落嘅：標目右手邊嘅村名屬上一段、左手邊先係新段——本批三個標目全部符合。例如【典史管屬客籍村莊 附】右手邊一欄兩名〔黃里〕西頭、并坑埔屬上一段（典史本籍段尾），左手邊嘅白芒村、謝山頭、長嶺皮、三坑先係典史客籍段；【縣丞管屬村莊】右手邊同樣係〔黃里〕西頭、并坑埔（即典史客籍段尾），左手邊由大鵬城內、大鵬城外起係縣丞本籍段；【縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附】右手邊嘅 28 名（溪涌村、上洞、下洞、平洲村、沙魚涌、關湖村、葵涌村、下村仔、東門村、牛唇嶺、烏涌村、西山村、嶺下嶺、石橋頭、新橋村、南坑埔、鶴藪村、柯屋圍、苔涌村、茅山村、鵝公村、南澳村、高鐵村、楓木潦、水頭沙、油草棚、東山下、鹿嘴村）係縣丞本籍段尾，左手邊嘅黃旗塘、〔母〕王洞圍、高嶺、大石村、岐沙、〔母〕王洞墟（6 名）先係縣丞客籍段。三個段嘅數目同志錄逐條對得上，係本批最硬嘅證據：典史客籍＝第 57 頁上葉左半標目後 4 名（白芒村、謝山頭、長嶺皮、三坑）＋第 57 頁下葉右半首欄 2 名（〔黃里〕西頭、并坑埔）＝6，同志錄所記典史客籍 6 條一致；縣丞客籍＝第 58 頁上葉標目後 6 名＋第 58 頁下葉 36 名＋第 59 頁上葉標目右手邊 2 名（新圍、深水田，批次 M7 已記為「標目之前屬上一段」）＝44，同志錄所記縣丞客籍 44 條一致；縣丞本籍＝第 57 頁下葉 34 名（標目後 16 名＋左半 18 名）＋第 58 頁上葉 28 名＝62，志錄記 60，差 2（照站規唔硬改志錄數字，差異入 /coverage 缺口，留待高倍覆核）。四司段落嘅次序亦由此確立（依掃描本讀序）：典史（本籍→客籍附，掃描本第 57 頁前後）→ 縣丞（本籍→客籍附，第 57 頁下葉至第 59 頁上葉）→ 官富司（本籍→客籍附，第 59 頁上葉至第 65 頁上葉）→ 福永司（第 65 頁下葉至第 68 頁下葉）；四司合計 67＋6＋60＋44＋298＋194＋185＝854，同志錄所記全縣 854 條村莊一致。地理上，可辨認嘅村名同司屬範圍完全吻合：典史段係南頭縣城一帶（流塘村、後海村、龜廟村、伶仃村、灣下村、谿西村、后滘村、三石下、龍岡村、高地村等）；縣丞段盡係今深圳大鵬、沙頭角、葵涌、南澳一帶（大鵬城內、大鵬城外、水貝村、田心圍、大坑村、東村、半天雲、西貢圍、南社圍、沙岡圍、橫岡圍、大嶺下、碧洲圍、鶴藪村、坪山仔、犬眠地上、犬眠地下、水頭村、鹽田村、埔錦村、埔尾村、吉龍里、王母墟、鴨母腳、高圳頭、大梅沙、小梅沙、溪涌村、沙魚涌、葵涌村、南澳村、水頭沙、鹿嘴村、葵涌墟、土洋、第三溪、楓樹頭、洞背、鹽寮下、凹頭、楊梅坑、下沙、石角頭）——同卷之十二「海防畧」所記大鵬所城、大鵬營屬同一片地域，但按站規只並排，唔會由地名反推官署駐地；官富司段由第 59 頁起係今元朗、屏山、屯門、大嶼山（批次 M7）同北區、大埔、沙田、西貢（批次 M8）；福永司段係今深圳西部（批次 M6）。即「都里」全份大致由縣城（南頭）向東（大鵬）、再入香港、最後向西北（深圳寶安）續走。逐葉村名（照掃描本字形抄錄；同一欄由上而下、葉內右半先讀、跨過版心續讀）：第 57 頁上葉右半 18 名——流塘村、鰲灣村、豬凹村、龍井村、關家圍、文岡村、下黃里、三石下、龍岡村、東柵村、後海村、高地村、灣下村、谿西村、龜廟村、后滘村、興隆村、〔黃里〕西頭；第 57 頁上葉左半 11 名——南桂村、新興村、〔黃里〕東頭、油榨村、周田莆、雛新村、茶岡村、伶仃村、鰕來村、蔗園村、莆心村（該欄只印一個村名），其左為【典史管屬客籍村莊 附】標目，標目左邊 4 名——白芒村、謝山頭、長嶺皮、三坑；第 57 頁下葉右半 18 名——〔黃里〕西頭、并坑埔（典史客籍段尾）、【縣丞管屬村莊】標目、大鵬城內、大鵬城外、水貝村、田心圍、大坑村、松山下、東村、半天雲、西貢圍、南社圍、沙岡圍、鳳岡里、橫岡圍、大嶺下；第 57 頁下葉左半 18 名——新屋仔、碧洲圍、鶴藪村、坪山仔、犬眠地上、犬眠地下、古樓嶺、水頭村、鹽田村、埔錦村、埔尾村、吉龍里、王母墟、鴨母腳、王母峒、高圳頭、大梅沙、小梅沙；第 58 頁上葉右半 18 名——溪涌村、上洞、下洞、平洲村、沙魚涌、關湖村、葵涌村、下村仔、東門村、牛唇嶺、烏涌村、西山村、嶺下嶺、石橋頭、新橋村、南坑埔、鶴藪村、柯屋圍；第 58 頁上葉左半 10 名——苔涌村、茅山村、鵝公村、南澳村、高鐵村、楓木潦、水頭沙、油草棚、東山下、鹿嘴村，其左為【縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附】標目，標目左邊 6 名——黃旗塘、〔母〕王洞圍、高嶺、大石村、岐沙、〔母〕王洞墟；第 58 頁下葉右半 18 名——橫坑、石角頭、王姓、戴姓、李達春、曾姓、梁姓、張姓、辛姓、陳姓、長山下、大確、龍岐村、犬眠地、楊梅坑、下沙、登福、水頭；第 58 頁下葉左半 18 名——新屋仔、葵涌墟、土洋、白水塘、第三溪、逕心、大嵐坑、楓樹頭、屯園子、黃欖坑、白石岡、張屋村、高圳頭、洞背、鹽寮下、新屋仔、凹頭、橫頭村。四葉合共讀出 139 個村名（第 57 頁上葉 33、第 57 頁下葉 36、第 58 頁上葉 34、第 58 頁下葉 36），另有三個分段標目。按站規一律「照掃描本字形抄錄」：唔逐村指派今址、唔當統計數字；深圳同香港兩邊都有同名村落（下沙、水頭、鶴藪一類），所以唔會因為同名就當係今日同一條村。字形未能在高倍放大下確認嘅一批已列入 /coverage 缺口：鰲灣村（鰲／鼇）、東柵村、谿西村（谿／溪）、后滘村（首字「后」抑或「後」未確認）、周田莆、雛新村、莆心村、鰕來村（鰕／蝦）、蔗園村（蔗／蕉／簾）、并坑埔、半天雲、鳳岡里、碧洲圍、犬眠地上同犬眠地下、古樓嶺、埔錦村、吉龍里、王母墟、王母峒（峒／洞）、高圳頭、大確、犬眠地、登福、逕心、屯園子、黃欖坑、第三溪、洞背、鹽寮下、葵涌墟（墟／村）、柯屋圍、牛唇嶺、嶺下嶺、南坑埔、油草棚、高鐵村、楓木潦、鹿嘴村。印刷字形同正字唔同者：掃描本「豬凹村」印「猪」（「豬」俗寫）、「鴨母腳」印「脚」，正文一律寫正字，同批次 M7 將標目通俗寫法寫成「村莊」同一處理。第 58 頁下葉「新屋仔」同葉兩見（一欄緊貼版心、另一欄配「鹽寮下」），本站照錄、唔推定係同一村抑或兩村。欄首小字方面：第 57 頁上葉讀到〔黃里〕（配「西頭」「東頭」，而同葉另有「下黃里」一欄名字本身含「黃里」二字，兩者關係未確認）；縣丞客籍段「王洞圍」「王洞墟」前各有一個小字「母」（縣丞段以外未見），係圖／約名前綴抑或名字嘅一部分未確認——同批次 M7〔屏山〕〔元萌〕同類，一律照錄、唔推定其義。版心方面：四葉均題「新安縣志／卷之二／都里」；第 57 頁上葉同第 58 頁上葉版心下端另有一個字形（形近「七」或「去」），第 58 頁下葉版心下端清楚作「六」——係唔係葉次未能確認（上下葉之數同「上葉先讀」唔一致，正係唔敢據版心判讀序嘅原因），所以唔填頁次。本批讀序靠兩樣獨立證據定：第一，標目右手邊＝上一段尾嘅規矩令典史客籍 6、縣丞客籍 44 同志錄完全對上（若上下葉次序調轉，兩段開頭就會換咗司屬，數字即刻對唔上）；第二，村名地理連續性——第 58 頁上葉左半 6 名 → 第 58 頁下葉右半（橫坑、石角頭、楊梅坑、下沙、水頭…）→ 第 58 頁下葉左半（葵涌墟、土洋、第三溪…）→ 第 59 頁上葉首欄（新圍、深水田）全部係今深圳大鵬、葵涌、南澳一帶，順住縣丞段地理走，冇插入香港村名。同時更正批次 M4 一處位置記述：M4 記「第 58 頁下半葉已見『縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附』標目」，本批實測標目喺掃描本第 58 頁上半葉（即上半幅）左半；M4 另一句「第 58 頁上半葉係溪涌、沙魚涌、葵涌、南澳一帶（今深圳大鵬側）」則完全正確（即該葉右半同左半）。官富司本籍段嘅範圍亦由此收窄：第 58 頁上下兩葉屬縣丞段，官富司本籍段係第 59 頁上葉起至第 62 頁上下葉。志錄並排對照：《香港志》志錄記 1819 年官富司轄村本籍 298／客籍 194（EV-18190000-19）、全縣本籍 579／客籍 275（EV-18190000-18）、全縣 854 條（EV-18190000-34）；同卷跋語（批次 M6 讀到）記舊志「鄉三、都七、圖五十有七、村將及五百」同「現查本籍村莊五百七十有奇、客籍村莊二百七十有奇，分隸於縣丞、典史兩巡檢屬下」，四司數字逐段對住志錄：官富 492（298＋194）、福永 185（154＋31）、縣丞 104（60＋44）、典史 73（67＋6），合共 854。典史本籍（志錄 67）同官富司本籍（志錄 298）嘅逐葉對數，留待下一批逐葉覆核（批次 M10 已補齊：典史本籍逐葉 67 名同志錄完全吻合、官富司本籍逐葉 300 名對志錄 298 條差 2，同司客籍 −2 相抵、合計 492 ✓，見批次 M10 條目）。
English
The Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer lists its villages office by office in juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”, each of the four offices (Guanfu, Fuyong, the county deputy and the registrar) keeping an indigenous list and an appended Hakka list. Batches M7 and M8 reached the indigenous Guanfu list from page 59 of the scan onwards, but the three sub-headings standing before page 58 had never been located, so the boundaries between the offices could only be inferred from the archive’s totals. Batch M9 reads the four leaves of pages 57 and 58 and closes that gap: the left half of the upper leaf of page 57 carries “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended”, the right half of the lower leaf of page 57 carries “Villages under the County Deputy”, and the left half of the upper leaf of page 58 carries “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended”. With the Guanfu heading of batch M7, the starting point of every office’s list is now located (the scan prints the last character of its headings in the popular form; this site always writes the traditional 村莊). The rule fixed in batches M6 and M7 holds throughout: the names to the right of a heading close the preceding stretch, and those to its left open the new one. So the two names to the right of “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended” — 〔黃里〕西頭 and 并坑埔 — end the registrar’s indigenous list, while 白芒村, 謝山頭, 長嶺皮 and 三坑 to its left open his Hakka list; the same two names stand to the right of “Villages under the County Deputy”, whose left side opens the county deputy’s indigenous list with 大鵬城內 and 大鵬城外; and the twenty-eight names to the right of “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended” — 溪涌村, 上洞, 下洞, 平洲村, 沙魚涌, 關湖村, 葵涌村, 下村仔, 東門村, 牛唇嶺, 烏涌村, 西山村, 嶺下嶺, 石橋頭, 新橋村, 南坑埔, 鶴藪村, 柯屋圍, 苔涌村, 茅山村, 鵝公村, 南澳村, 高鐵村, 楓木潦, 水頭沙, 油草棚, 東山下 and 鹿嘴村 — end his indigenous list, while the six to its left — 黃旗塘, 〔母〕王洞圍, 高嶺, 大石村, 岐沙 and 〔母〕王洞墟 — open his Hakka list. The counts are the batch’s hardest evidence, matching the archive name for name: the registrar’s Hakka list runs 4 names on the upper leaf of page 57 (白芒村, 謝山頭, 長嶺皮, 三坑) plus 2 in the first column of the lower leaf (〔黃里〕西頭, 并坑埔), six in all, exactly the six the archive records; the county deputy’s Hakka list runs 6 names on the upper leaf of page 58, 36 on the lower leaf of page 58 and the 2 names standing to the right of the Guanfu heading on the upper leaf of page 59 (新圍 and 深水田, which batch M7 had already marked as belonging to the stretch before that heading), forty-four in all, exactly the forty-four the archive records; and his indigenous list counts 34 names on the lower leaf of page 57 (16 after the heading and 18 in the left half) plus 28 on the upper leaf of page 58, sixty-two against the archive’s sixty — a difference of two recorded as a gap and left for high-magnification re-checking rather than used to correct the archive’s figure. The order of the four offices’ lists follows from that (in the order the scan is read): the registrar (indigenous, then Hakka appended) around page 57 of the scan; the county deputy (indigenous, then Hakka appended) from the lower leaf of page 57 to the upper leaf of page 59; the Guanfu Office (indigenous, then Hakka appended) from the upper leaf of page 59 to the upper leaf of page 65; and the Fuyong Office from the lower leaf of page 65 to the lower leaf of page 68. The four offices add up to 67 + 6 + 60 + 44 + 298 + 194 + 185 = 854, the county-wide total of villages the archive records. Geographically every identifiable name sits where its office belongs: the registrar’s stretch lies around the county seat at Nantou (流塘村, 後海村, 龜廟村, 伶仃村, 灣下村, 谿西村, 后滘村, 三石下, 龍岡村, 高地村 and so on); the county deputy’s lies entirely in what is now Shenzhen’s Dapeng, Shatoujiao, Kuichong and Nan’ao country (大鵬城內, 大鵬城外, 水貝村, 田心圍, 大坑村, 東村, 半天雲, 西貢圍, 南社圍, 沙岡圍, 橫岡圍, 大嶺下, 碧洲圍, 鶴藪村, 坪山仔, 犬眠地上, 犬眠地下, 水頭村, 鹽田村, 埔錦村, 埔尾村, 吉龍里, 王母墟, 鴨母腳, 高圳頭, 大梅沙, 小梅沙, 溪涌村, 沙魚涌, 葵涌村, 南澳村, 水頭沙, 鹿嘴村, 葵涌墟, 土洋, 第三溪, 楓樹頭, 洞背, 鹽寮下, 凹頭, 楊梅坑, 下沙 and 石角頭) — the same ground as the Dapeng fort and camp recorded in juan 12, “Coastal Defence”, though this site sets the two side by side and never infers where an office was seated from place names; the Guanfu stretch from page 59 onwards is what is now Yuen Long, Ping Shan, Tuen Mun and Lantau (batch M7) and the North District, Tai Po, Sha Tin and Sai Kung (batch M8); and the Fuyong stretch is western Shenzhen today (batch M6). The “Villages” section therefore runs roughly from the county seat eastwards to Dapeng, then into Hong Kong, then back north-west into Bao’an. Leaf by leaf (names transcribed as printed, read downwards within each column, right half before left half and on across the running head): upper leaf of page 57, right half, eighteen names — 流塘村, 鰲灣村, 豬凹村, 龍井村, 關家圍, 文岡村, 下黃里, 三石下, 龍岡村, 東柵村, 後海村, 高地村, 灣下村, 谿西村, 龜廟村, 后滘村, 興隆村 and 〔黃里〕西頭; left half, eleven — 南桂村, 新興村, 〔黃里〕東頭, 油榨村, 周田莆, 雛新村, 茶岡村, 伶仃村, 鰕來村, 蔗園村 and 莆心村 (a column printing a single name), then the heading “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended” and, to its left, 白芒村, 謝山頭, 長嶺皮 and 三坑; lower leaf of page 57, right half, eighteen — 〔黃里〕西頭 and 并坑埔 (closing the registrar’s Hakka list), the heading “Villages under the County Deputy”, then 大鵬城內, 大鵬城外, 水貝村, 田心圍, 大坑村, 松山下, 東村, 半天雲, 西貢圍, 南社圍, 沙岡圍, 鳳岡里, 橫岡圍 and 大嶺下; left half, eighteen — 新屋仔, 碧洲圍, 鶴藪村, 坪山仔, 犬眠地上, 犬眠地下, 古樓嶺, 水頭村, 鹽田村, 埔錦村, 埔尾村, 吉龍里, 王母墟, 鴨母腳, 王母峒, 高圳頭, 大梅沙 and 小梅沙; upper leaf of page 58, right half, eighteen — 溪涌村, 上洞, 下洞, 平洲村, 沙魚涌, 關湖村, 葵涌村, 下村仔, 東門村, 牛唇嶺, 烏涌村, 西山村, 嶺下嶺, 石橋頭, 新橋村, 南坑埔, 鶴藪村 and 柯屋圍; left half, ten — 苔涌村, 茅山村, 鵝公村, 南澳村, 高鐵村, 楓木潦, 水頭沙, 油草棚, 東山下 and 鹿嘴村, then the heading “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended” and, to its left, 黃旗塘, 〔母〕王洞圍, 高嶺, 大石村, 岐沙 and 〔母〕王洞墟; lower leaf of page 58, right half, eighteen — 橫坑, 石角頭, 王姓, 戴姓, 李達春, 曾姓, 梁姓, 張姓, 辛姓, 陳姓, 長山下, 大確, 龍岐村, 犬眠地, 楊梅坑, 下沙, 登福 and 水頭; left half, eighteen — 新屋仔, 葵涌墟, 土洋, 白水塘, 第三溪, 逕心, 大嵐坑, 楓樹頭, 屯園子, 黃欖坑, 白石岡, 張屋村, 高圳頭, 洞背, 鹽寮下, 新屋仔, 凹頭 and 橫頭村. The four leaves yield 139 village names (33 on the upper leaf of page 57, 36 on its lower leaf, 34 on the upper leaf of page 58 and 36 on its lower leaf) and three sub-headings. As always the names are transcribed as the scan prints them: no village is pinned to a modern site, no village is assigned to an office, none is counted as a statistic, and because like-named villages stand on both sides of the border (下沙, 水頭, 鶴藪 and the like) a shared name is never taken to mean the same village today. A set of glyphs that could not be confirmed at high magnification is listed among the site’s /coverage gaps: 鰲灣村 (鰲 or 鼇), 東柵村, 谿西村 (谿 or 溪), 后滘村 (its first character 后 or 後, unconfirmed), 周田莆, 雛新村, 莆心村, 鰕來村 (鰕 or 蝦), 蔗園村 (蔗, 蕉 or 簾), 并坑埔, 半天雲, 鳳岡里, 碧洲圍, 犬眠地上 and 犬眠地下, 古樓嶺, 埔錦村, 吉龍里, 王母墟, 王母峒 (峒 or 洞), 高圳頭, 大確, 犬眠地, 登福, 逕心, 屯園子, 黃欖坑, 第三溪, 洞背, 鹽寮下, 葵涌墟 (墟 or 村), 柯屋圍, 牛唇嶺, 嶺下嶺, 南坑埔, 油草棚, 高鐵村, 楓木潦 and 鹿嘴村. Where the printed form differs from the standard character the text uses the standard one: the scan prints 猪 for 豬凹村 (a popular form of 豬) and 脚 for 鴨母腳, and this site writes the standard forms there, exactly as it writes 村莊 where the batch M7 heading was printed in the popular form. 新屋仔 occurs twice on the lower leaf of page 58 (once in the column beside the running head, once paired with 鹽寮下): both are transcribed as printed and neither is assumed to be the same village as the other. Of the small-type characters: on the upper leaf of page 57 the prefix 〔黃里〕 heads three columns (over 西頭 and 東頭), while the separate name 下黃里 itself contains the characters 黃里 — the relation between the two is unconfirmed; and in the county deputy’s Hakka list the names 王洞圍 and 王洞墟 each stand behind a small-type 母 (not seen outside that stretch), which may be a map or covenant prefix or part of the name itself. Both are transcribed as printed and never interpreted, like the 〔屏山〕 and 〔元萌〕 of batch M7. The running heads of all four leaves read “Xin’an County Gazetteer / juan 2 / Villages”; at the foot of the running head the upper leaves of pages 57 and 58 carry a further character (shaped like 七 or 去) while the lower leaf of page 58 clearly reads 六 — whether these are folio numbers is unconfirmed, and because those numbers do not agree with reading the upper leaf of a page first they are precisely what stops this site from reading the order off the running heads, so no folio number is given. The reading order rests instead on two independent proofs: first, the rule that names to the right of a heading close the preceding stretch brings the registrar’s Hakka total to 6 and the county deputy’s to 44, exactly the archive’s figures (swap the two leaves of a page and those totals break immediately); second, the geography of the names — the six names at the left of the upper leaf of page 58, then the right half of the lower leaf (橫坑, 石角頭, 楊梅坑, 下沙, 水頭 …), then its left half (葵涌墟, 土洋, 第三溪 …) and then the first column of the upper leaf of page 59 (新圍 and 深水田) all lie in what is now Shenzhen’s Dapeng, Kuichong and Nan’ao country, running on with the county deputy’s list and admitting no Hong Kong village. One positional statement of batch M4 is corrected: M4 recorded that the heading “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended” was already visible on the lower leaf of page 58, whereas this batch finds it in the left half of the upper leaf of page 58; M4’s other sentence — that the upper leaf of page 58 holds 溪涌, 沙魚涌, 葵涌 and 南澳, in what is now Shenzhen’s Dapeng country — is exactly right, those being its right half and the first part of its left half. The extent of the indigenous Guanfu list is narrowed accordingly: both leaves of page 58 belong to the county deputy’s section, so the indigenous Guanfu list runs from the upper leaf of page 59 to the fourteen names to the right of the heading on the upper leaf of page 63. Set alongside the archive: the Chronicles archive records 298 indigenous and 194 Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office in 1819 (EV-18190000-19), 579 indigenous and 275 Hakka county-wide (EV-18190000-18) and 854 villages county-wide (EV-18190000-34); the colophon read in batch M6 records the old gazetteer’s “three xiang, seven du, fifty-seven tu and close on five hundred villages” together with “570-odd indigenous villages and 270-odd Hakka villages, distributed under the county deputy and the registrar”; office by office the four lists now agree with the archive — Guanfu 492 (298 + 194), Fuyong 185 (154 + 31), county deputy 104 (60 + 44) and registrar 73 (67 + 6), 854 in all. Counting the registrar’s indigenous list (67 in the archive) and the indigenous Guanfu list (298) leaf by leaf has since been completed in batch M10: the registrar’s indigenous list counts 67 names leaf by leaf, matching the archive exactly, while the indigenous Guanfu list counts 300 against the archive’s 298, the excess cancelling the office’s two-name Hakka shortfall.
出處：掃描本：《廣州大典》第三十五輯·史部方志類·第六十三冊，嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二 輿地畧一「都里」——【典史管屬客籍村莊 附】、【縣丞管屬村莊】、【縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附】三個分段標目，連同標目前後嘅村名，即掃描本第 57 頁上下兩葉同第 58 頁上下兩葉，合共四葉；版心逐葉實測題「新安縣志／卷之二／都里」，第 57 頁上葉同第 58 頁上葉版心下端另有一個字形（形近「七」或「去」）、第 58 頁下葉版心下端清楚作「六」，係唔係葉次未能確認，所以唔填頁次；Commons sha1 ad357f97…。掃描本冇可用文字層，內容一律人手核讀（裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）：全葉圖 1400、左右半葉放大 1600、單欄同窄條放大 900–1100）：見 scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift。Provenance: Scan: Guangzhou Dadian, series 35 (local gazetteers), volume 63 — the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, “Radiations of the Territory” part 1, “Villages”: the three sub-headings “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended”, “Villages under the County Deputy” and “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended”, together with the villages standing before and after them, being both leaves of page 57 and both leaves of page 58 of the scan, four leaves in all. Each leaf’s running head was read directly as “Xin’an County Gazetteer / juan 2 / Villages”; at the foot of the running head the upper leaves of pages 57 and 58 carry a further character (shaped like 七 or 去), while the lower leaf of page 58 clearly reads 六 — whether these are folio numbers could not be confirmed, so no folio number is given; Commons sha1 ad357f97…. The scan has no usable text layer, so its content is read by hand (whole-leaf crops at 1400 px and half-leaf and narrow-strip magnified crops at 900–1600 px, 裁圖工具（唔用 OCR）): see scripts/ocr-pd-gazetteer-scans.swift.