電影 · Film · 2009

竊聽風雲

Overheard

不準確 Inaccurate
作品 / Work竊聽風雲
Overheard
年份 / Year2009
媒介 / Medium電影
Film
判定 / Verdict不準確
Inaccurate

坊間流傳嘅橋段 / The claim

戲中警方情報科可以自行裝竊聽器、截取通訊,甚至向上司隱瞞;現實中警方係咪可以隨意竊聽、截取通訊?

In the film, the police intelligence unit installs bugs and intercepts communications on its own, even hiding it from superiors — can the police really wiretap at will?

事實應該係點 / What really happens

香港嘅截取通訊同秘密監察受《截取通訊及監察條例》(第589章,ICSO)嚴格規管。執法人員必須先取得「訂明授權」才可進行:截取通訊及第一類監察(較侵犯私隱者)須由小組法官(須為原訟法庭法官)授權,第二類監察則由法定部門首長指定的授權人員批准;申請須符合「必要性」同「相稱性」兩項測試。條例設有獨立監督:截取通訊及監察事務專員(須為合資格法官)負責監察,並每年向行政長官提交報告;受影響人士亦可向專員申請審查。所以劇中情報人員自行竊聽、繞過授權程序,屬戲劇誇張。

In Hong Kong, interception of communications and covert surveillance are tightly regulated by the Interception of Communications and Surveillance Ordinance (Cap. 589, ICSO). Officers must first obtain a "prescribed authorisation": interception and Type 1 (more intrusive) surveillance require authorisation by a panel judge, who must be a judge of the Court of First Instance, while Type 2 surveillance may be authorised by designated officers of the relevant departments. Applications must satisfy tests of necessity and proportionality. The Ordinance provides independent oversight: the Commissioner on Interception of Communications and Surveillance (who must be an eligible judge) monitors compliance and reports annually to the Chief Executive, and affected persons may apply to the Commissioner for an examination. Officers wiretapping on their own initiative, as the film shows, is dramatic licence.

劇中不準確之處 / Inaccuracies

本頁只核對劇中描述同事實嘅出入,並非對作品嘅藝術評價。判定屬編輯判斷;凡涉及法律程序嘅描述,以《基本法》、相關法例同司法機構/律政司官方資料為準。未能以官方來源核實嘅橋段一律不作判定。

同媒介其他條目 / Other Film entries

資料來源 / Sources

相關頁面:影視橋段真偽、香港改編歌、大事記。