- 已核實條目
- 20
Verified entries
Hong Kong screen fact-check
Is that how it really works? Fact-checking Hong Kong film and TV plots
香港電影同電視劇有唔少橋段為咗戲劇效果而簡化或改動現實——法庭程序、警察辦案、法證、歷史人物、醫療同金融等等,觀眾看後常問「咁樣係咪真㗎?」。本專題逐條核對:先寫出坊間流傳嘅橋段,再交代事實應該係點,並具體指出劇中不準確之處。每條附判定(準確/部分準確/不準確)同已登記嘅資料來源。凡官方文件或法例有明確答案嘅,一律以官方為準;未核實嘅唔會收錄。
Hong Kong films and TV dramas often simplify or alter reality for dramatic effect — court procedure, police investigation, forensics, historical figures, medicine and finance among them — and viewers frequently ask "is that how it really works?". Each entry states the claim in circulation, then the verified reality, and pins down the specific inaccuracies, with a verdict (accurate / partly accurate / inaccurate) and registered sources. Where an official document or statute gives a definite answer, it governs; unverified material is not included.
Verified entries
TV series
Films
Rated inaccurate
準確(Accurate)1 項、部分準確(Partly accurate)11 項、不準確(Inaccurate)8 項。判定分三級:準確指劇中描述大致符合現實;部分準確指核心事實成立但有戲劇化簡化;不準確指劇中描述同事實有實質出入。
每條條目至少引用一個非維基來源(官方文件、法例、機構聲明、媒體報道等),並在詳情頁逐項列出。判定屬編輯判斷,旨在指出明顯出入,並非對作品嘅藝術評價。凡涉及法律程序嘅描述,以《基本法》、法例同司法機構/律政司官方資料為準。
共 13 項。
共 7 項。
Auto Chat
只從已核對條目作答,不發明數字。