Long-form / 深度專題

工業化:由轉口港到世界工廠,再到服務業城市

Industrialisation: from entrepôt to factory city, then service economy

香港曾經係製造業城市,點解最後會變成以服務業為主?

1850 年,香港島製造業就業人口只有 5 人;1971 年,製造業佔全港就業 47.0%。由紡織、塑膠、玩具到電子,工業養活了大量家庭;但 1980 年代工廠北移,1996 年服務業已佔本地生產總值 84%。呢段轉折唔只是「產業升級」,亦係一次就業、性別同城市空間嘅重組。

約 3 分鐘 · 5 節 · 15 條時間線 · 2 份文獻

黑白照片:一幢三層高廠房,樓上兩層是連續拱廊,外牆橫額寫著「F. BLACKHEAD & CO’S SOAP AND SODA FACTORY」,左邊是陡峭山崖,前方是草地與小樹。
1908 年書刊所見的筲箕灣 F. Blackhead 肥皂與純鹼廠。The F. Blackhead soap and soda factory in Shau Kei Wan, as printed in a 1908 volume.刊於 1908 年《Twentieth Century Impressions of Hong Kong》(Arnold Wright 編);照片本身拍攝年份不詳,Commons 記錄為 1908 年。 · 歷史照片,經 Wikimedia Commons 取得 · Public domain Commons 檔案頁 sha1 6d80e978ff5b…

繁體中文

一、轉口港裡面嘅工業:由 5 個人開始

香港開埠初期嘅經濟命脈係轉口貿易,但製造業並冇完全缺席。1850 年,香港島製造業就業人口首次有記錄,只有 5 人;五年後嘅 1855 年,製造業就業人數已達 3,491 人,佔就業人口 20.0%,即每五個就業人口就有一個從事製造。呢個跳躍提醒我們,早期「工業」多數係同港口有關嘅輔助行業——造船修船、繩索、糖薑、食品加工——而唔係後來嘅大型工廠。

1898 年,怡和洋行創辦香港棉紡織染公司,在銅鑼灣設廠,擁有五萬枚紗錠。呢個投資說明,香港已經有資本、港口同技術條件去辦現代紡織廠;但真正令工業成為全民就業來源嘅,係二戰之後嘅人口、資金同出口市場同時到位。由轉口到製造,唔係一夜之間取代,而係一層一層疊上去。

二、戰後起飛:紡織、塑膠、電子

1946 年 11 月 7 日,大南紡織有限公司完成註冊,係二戰結束後香港首家紗廠。1947 年,運輸設備、紡織同金屬製品分別佔製造業僱用 30.7%、19.7% 同 11.5%——運輸設備仍然排第一,反映造船修船同港口經濟嘅重量。到 1953 年,紡織業已佔製造業僱用 33.7%,金屬製品佔 16.8%,工業結構明顯轉向輕工業。

1960 年代,香港經濟進入起飛期:紡織、製衣、塑膠等傳統工業,連同電子、鐘錶、玩具等新興產業迅速增長。呢個組合唔係偶然,而係由出口市場、配額制度同大量廉價勞動力共同塑造。1971 年,製造業佔全港就業 47.0%,即差不多每兩個就業人口就有一個在做工業——呢個比例今日已經難以想像。

三、配額:出口限制如何反過來塑造工業

1958 年 12 月,港府與英國貿易委員會簽署《蘭開夏協定》,1959 年 2 月 1 日生效,要求香港自行限制輸往英國嘅棉織品每年不超過 1.64 億平方碼,為期三年。呢份協議係歐美國家對香港紡織品實施配額以來,雙方首份相關協議。配額表面係限制,實際上亦把香港納入一套可預測嘅貿易規則:有配額,就有出口權,亦有分配同轉讓嘅市場。

1974 年起,《多種纖維協定》對紡織品貿易實施嚴厲配額限制;1983 年底,美國對香港紡織品與成衣施加更嚴格管制,並採用可隨時中止嘅機制。呢啲外部衝擊迫使廠商提高產品檔次、開拓新市場,亦加速部分工序外移。配額唔只是「阻礙出口」,它同時改寫了工廠規模、產品組合同地區分工。

四、工廠城市:觀塘、勞動力與性別

工業唔只係數字,亦係空間。1970 年代,觀塘一帶聚集約 2,700 家廠房,聘用 116,000 名員工,主要從事電子、塑膠同製衣。呢種「工業區+徙置區+新市鎮」嘅組合,令工人可以住在工廠附近,亦令空氣、交通同社區設施承受壓力。香港嘅工業化,係以高密度城市形態承載嘅。

製造業亦改變了女性就業。1961 年,女性在製造業嘅就業比例為 46.1%;1971 年升至 58.2%;到 1991 年回落至 31.2%。呢條曲線說明,工業擴張時期女性大量進入工廠,但當工序外移、服務業興起,女性就業亦要重新轉向。廠房關閉唔只是老闆嘅損失,亦係一批工人嘅技能同生計被重新安排。

廠房密集亦帶來安全、通風同衛生問題。香港嘅工廠法規由保障童工開始,逐步擴展到一般工廠安全同工人健康;但法例寫咗幾多,同巡查有幾密、罰則有幾重,係兩件事。呢個缺口令「工業起飛」嘅故事唔可以只講產量,亦要講工人在咩條件下生產。

五、北移與服務化:工業城市嘅終結?

1980 年代至 1990 年代,香港製造業逐步轉移至內地,同時金融等高端服務業迅速發展。服務業佔本地生產總值比例在 1996 年達 84%;1984 年至 1996 年間,服務業產值年均增長率以市值計為 16%。呢個轉變令香港成為以服務業為主導嘅城市,但亦意味着大量藍領職位消失,工種由生產轉向物流、零售、金融同專業服務。

「服務化」唔等於所有工人都升級。部分人成功轉到更高薪嘅專業職位,部分人則轉向較低薪、較不穩定嘅服務工作;工業區亦要面對廠房空置、土地改劃同社區老化。呢啲分配後果,需要逐區、逐行業嘅官方數據才講得清楚,本篇唔會用一句「經濟轉型成功」蓋過。

未解與缺口

  • 工廠安全、工時、工資同職業病嘅官方統計未在本篇展開。
  • 工業政策、稅務優惠、土地批給同技術升級支援未逐項查核。
  • 中小型工廠、山寨廠、外發工同家庭手工業嘅規模未有完整數據。
  • 各工業區嘅污染、土地使用同社區影響未逐區核實。
  • 再工業化、創科產業同先進製造業嘅成效未在本篇範圍。

文獻點讀

  • 《香港志·自然》建置與地區概況(人口)p.530、p.537、p.540、p.542製造業就業比例、觀塘廠房數目同女性就業比例。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·總述 大事記》(公元前 5000 年至 2017 年,共 6,500 多條大事)p.40、p.183、p.262、p.315棉紡廠、戰後紗廠、蘭開夏協定同服務業佔 GDP 比例。官方/出版者網址

頁碼係電子書頁碼;同一本書不同版次可能移位。引用時請連書名、卷冊同頁碼一齊寫。

English

1. Industry inside an entrepôt: starting from five workers

Hong Kong’s early economy was driven by entrepôt trade, but manufacturing was never entirely absent. In 1850 Hong Kong Island recorded only 5 manufacturing workers; by 1855 the figure had reached 3,491, or 20.0% of the employed population. The jump is a reminder that early “industry” was mostly port-related support work — shipbuilding and repair, rope-making, ginger and food processing — rather than large factories.

In 1898 Jardine Matheson founded the Hong Kong Cotton Spinning, Weaving and Dyeing Company in Causeway Bay with 50,000 spindles. The investment showed that capital, port access and technical conditions for a modern textile mill already existed. What made industry a mass employer was the post-war combination of population, capital and export markets. The shift from entrepôt to manufacturing was layered, not a single replacement.

2. Post-war take-off: textiles, plastics, electronics

On 7 November 1946 Dah Nam Textile Limited was registered, the first spinning mill established after the Second World War. In 1947 transport equipment, textiles and metal products accounted for 30.7%, 19.7% and 11.5% of manufacturing employment respectively — transport equipment still led, reflecting the weight of shipbuilding, repair and the port economy. By 1953 textiles had reached 33.7% and metal products 16.8%, a clear turn towards light industry.

In the 1960s the economy took off: traditional textiles, garment-making and plastics grew alongside newer electronics, watches and toys. The mix was shaped by export markets, quota rules and a large low-cost workforce. By 1971 manufacturing accounted for 47.0% of employment — nearly one in two workers — a share hard to imagine today.

3. Quotas: how export limits shaped industry

In December 1958 the Hong Kong Government signed the Lancashire Agreement with the United Kingdom Board of Trade. Effective 1 February 1959, it required Hong Kong to limit cotton textile exports to Britain to no more than 164 million square yards a year for three years — the first such agreement after Western countries imposed quotas on Hong Kong textiles. A quota looks like a restriction, but it also brought Hong Kong into a predictable trade regime: with quota came export rights, and a market for allocating and transferring them.

From 1974 the Multi-Fibre Arrangement imposed strict textile quotas; at the end of 1983 the United States imposed tighter controls on Hong Kong textiles and clothing, with a mechanism that could be suspended at any time. These external shocks pushed manufacturers to upgrade products, open new markets and move some processes offshore. Quotas did not simply “block exports”; they reshaped factory scale, product mix and regional division of labour.

4. The factory city: Kwun Tong, labour and gender

Industry was also space. In the 1970s about 2,700 factories clustered in Kwun Tong, employing 116,000 workers, mainly in electronics, plastics and garments. The combination of industrial estate, resettlement housing and new town let workers live near factories, while putting pressure on air, transport and community facilities. Hong Kong industrialised through a very dense urban form.

Manufacturing also changed women’s employment. In 1961, 46.1% of employed women worked in manufacturing; the share rose to 58.2% in 1971 and fell to 31.2% by 1991. The curve shows that women entered factories en masse during industrial expansion, but had to shift again as processes moved offshore and services grew. A factory closure was not only an owner’s loss; it rearranged the skills and livelihoods of a workforce.

Dense factories also brought safety, ventilation and sanitation problems. Hong Kong’s factory legislation began with child labour and gradually extended to general factory safety and workers’ health; but how much the law says is one thing, and how often inspectors visit and how heavy the penalties are is another. That gap means the story of industrial take-off cannot be only about output; it must also describe the conditions under which people produced.

5. Relocation and services: the end of the industrial city?

From the 1980s to the 1990s manufacturing gradually moved to the mainland while high-end services such as finance grew quickly. Services reached 84% of GDP in 1996; between 1984 and 1996 their output grew at an average annual rate of 16% at market value. The shift made Hong Kong a service-led city, but it also removed many blue-collar jobs, moving work from production to logistics, retail, finance and professional services.

“Servitisation” did not upgrade every worker. Some moved into better-paid professional roles; others moved into lower-paid, less secure service jobs. Industrial districts also faced vacant factories, rezoning and ageing communities. Those distributional outcomes need district and sector data; this dossier will not cover them with a slogan about “successful economic restructuring”.

Gaps

  • Official statistics on factory safety, hours, wages and occupational disease are not developed.
  • Industrial policy, tax incentives, land allocation and technology-upgrade support are not checked item by item.
  • The scale of small factories, cottage workshops, outwork and home-based manufacturing is not fully documented.
  • Pollution, land use and community effects in each industrial district are not verified district by district.
  • Reindustrialisation, innovation and advanced manufacturing are outside this dossier.

相關頁

引用本篇:請連標題、網址同「香港紀事館深度專題」一齊寫;時間線內每條條目仍以原書頁碼為準。

↑