電視劇 · TV series · 2011

怒火街頭

Ghetto Justice

不準確 Inaccurate
作品 / Work怒火街頭
Ghetto Justice
年份 / Year2011
媒介 / Medium電視劇
TV series
判定 / Verdict不準確
Inaccurate

坊間流傳嘅橋段 / The claim

劇中律師會用旁門左道、甚至違法嘅手段幫街坊蒐證、設局,現實中律師咁做係咪冇後果?

In the series lawyers use unconventional and even unlawful tactics — gathering evidence and setting traps — to help ordinary people. In reality, is a lawyer who does that free of consequences?

事實應該係點 / What really happens

香港嘅律師同大律師都要遵守專業操守:大律師受《大律師行為守則》約束,嚴重違反守則屬專業失當,可交由大律師紀律審裁組處理;事務律師則由香港律師會監管,違規可被紀律處分。最嚴重嘅後果係被暫時吊銷執業資格甚至除名。更重要嘅係,律師身分冇任何刑事豁免——如果親身干犯行賄、妨礙司法公正、非法入侵等罪行,一樣要負刑責。至於證據,以非法或不當手段取得嘅材料並唔係「拎到就用得」:法庭有剩餘酌情權,若接納證據會對被告不公平,可拒絕接納。所以劇中律師踩界取證、設局,現實中既可能構成罪行,亦屬專業失當。

In Hong Kong both barristers and solicitors are bound by professional-conduct rules. Barristers are governed by the Code of Conduct of the Bar, and serious breaches amount to professional misconduct that can be heard by the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal; solicitors are regulated by the Law Society, whose disciplinary process can also impose sanctions. The most serious outcomes include suspension or being struck off. Crucially, being a lawyer confers no immunity from the criminal law: a lawyer who commits bribery, perverting the course of justice, or trespass is personally liable. Nor is unlawfully obtained evidence automatically usable — the court retains a residual discretion to exclude evidence where admitting it would be unfair to the accused. Bending the rules to gather evidence or set traps can therefore amount to both a crime and professional misconduct.

劇中不準確之處 / Inaccuracies

本頁只核對劇中描述同事實嘅出入,並非對作品嘅藝術評價。判定屬編輯判斷;凡涉及法律程序嘅描述,以《基本法》、相關法例同司法機構/律政司官方資料為準。未能以官方來源核實嘅橋段一律不作判定。

同媒介其他條目 / Other TV series entries

資料來源 / Sources

相關頁面:影視橋段真偽、香港改編歌、大事記。