Long-form / 深度專題

航空與機場:由啟德到赤鱲角

Aviation and airports: from Kai Tak to Chek Lap Kok

香港嘅國際機場係幾時出現,又為何要由啟德搬到赤鱲角?

啟德最初唔係民航機場:計劃一度被英國國防委員會否決,後來以軍民兩用形式出現,民航要等到定期客機降落才真正開始。噴射機令機型變大,跑道貼住市區就成為上限;一九八零年代嘅決定把機場連同港口一齊規劃,最後一次搬遷喺同一日完成——新機場開、舊機場關。

約 4 分鐘 · 6 節 · 19 條時間線 · 4 份文獻

繁體中文

一、啟德之前:計劃被否決,機場照樣出現

1925 年,港府提出啟德濱機場計劃,但英國國防委員會以違反 1922 年華盛頓公約中「東亞不得增設空軍基地」嘅規定為由,否決方案。呢個否決說明一件事:機場最初唔係交通設施,而是軍事設施;用唔用得,取決於國際軍備安排,唔係本地需要。

四年之後,啟德濱機場嘅主要設施竣工並開始營運,兼具軍事與民用用途;同年,船政廳獲港府委任為航空事務處處長。由一個被否決嘅計劃,到一個真正運作嘅機場,中間靠嘅係「軍民兩用」呢個折衷。

民航嘅起點可以精確到一日:1936 年 3 月 24 日,英資帝國航空公司一架名為「多拉多號」嘅客機由檳城飛抵香港,成為首架降落啟德並使用當地民用飛機庫嘅民航客機。同年 10 月 23 日,泛美航空嘅水上飛機「菲律賓飛剪號」完成橫越太平洋首航,亦在啟德降落。定期航班同長途航線,就係咁樣先後接通。

二、日佔與戰後:跑道、控制塔與客運大廈

日佔時期,啟德被當成區域樞紐規劃。1942 年 9 月 10 日,日佔政府選址牛池灣,就啟德機場嘅擴建計劃舉辦動土儀式,目標係令機場日後成為東亞同東南亞一帶兼具民用及軍用功能嘅關鍵航空樞紐。

戰後民航事務需要一個專責部門。1946 年,民航處正式設立,取代船政廳負責啟德嘅民航事務。由「船政廳兼管航空」到「獨立民航機關」,代表航空由輔助性事務變成一個專業範疇。

硬件亦一步步擴大。1958 年 9 月 12 日,啟德機場 13/31 跑道投入運作,造價 9000 萬元;同日,機場改名為香港國際機場。1962 年 11 月 2 日,新客運大廈落成並舉行開幕典禮,同月 12 日投入運作。跑道同客運大廈相繼完成,等於把「可以降落」升級為「可以同時處理大量旅客」。

三、噴射機年代:容量天花板

1970 年 4 月 11 日,泛美世界航空公司一架波音 747 客機由東京飛抵啟德,係呢款當時全球最大型客機首次到訪香港;翌日,客機接載香港首批乘客,經日本前往三藩市。機型變大,對跑道長度、滑行道同客運大廈嘅要求同時提高。

啟德嘅限制唔在於設備,而在於位置:跑道伸入九龍灣,四周係密集樓宇,飛機升降要低飛過市區。呢種景觀成為香港特色,但同時意味住噪音、安全同擴建都冇乜餘地。

1978 年,香港政府拍板,將新機場定於赤鱲角。呢個決定唔係即時動工,而係先確立選址:一旦確定要搬,之後所有規劃——航道、填海、道路接駁——都要圍繞一個未建成嘅機場重新安排。

四、玫瑰園計劃:由拍板到啟用

1988 年 10 月 12 日,港督衞奕信在施政報告內提出,在赤鱲角興建一座新嘅國際機場,取代啟德。1989 年,港府對外公布一項建設方案,名為玫瑰園計劃,正式名稱係香港機場核心計劃。呢個名好重要:機場唔係單一工程,而係一組核心工程。

制度上亦要先建機構。1990 年,香港通過並實施《臨時機場管理局條例》,由臨時機場管理局負責新機場嘅規劃、設計同興建。先有法定機構,再有工程合約,係大型基建嘅固定次序。

貨運亦要另作安排。1995 年 6 月 30 日,中英雙方把新機場航空貨運專營權批予兩家企業,分別係香港空運貨站有限公司同亞洲空運中心有限公司。客運睇航班,貨運睇貨站;兩者嘅專營安排分開處理,說明空運貨物在香港係一個獨立產業。

1998 年 7 月 6 日,赤鱲角嘅香港國際機場投入服務,當日啟德機場亦停止運作。搬遷喺一日之內完成,冇重疊期。正因為咁,任何一個環節出錯都會即刻見光:同月 21 日,香港特別行政區政府成立調查委員會,就新機場啟用後嘅運作情況同問題成因進行探究。

五、三跑道:由方案到填海

機場啟用之後,擴建討論再次出現。2012 年 3 月 20 日,行政長官會同行政會議通過機場管理局提交嘅建議,決定採用「三跑道方案」。由兩個跑道增加到三個,唔係多一條跑道咁簡單:要新填海、新客運廊、新航道。

2016 年 8 月 1 日,機場管理局為第三跑道系統展開填海工程。填海係呢個項目最受關注嘅部分,因為它改變海牀同水域,環評同生態補償成為審批核心。同年 12 月 22 日,法院作出裁決,拒絕接納兩名申請人針對第三跑道環境影響評估所提出嘅司法覆核。

把三個日期連起來讀,會見到大型基建今日嘅固定程序:行政會議先定方案,工程跟住動工,司法覆核在動工之後仍有裁決。呢個次序唔代表爭議已解決,只代表程序走完。

六、未完成的部分

本篇唔補客運量、貨運量同航班架次。呢三套數字嘅統計口徑同公佈週期唔同,要逐年對照機場管理局年報同官方統計,本站未逐份核實。

機場核心計劃嘅造價、超支同財務安排亦留白:玫瑰園計劃涉及多項工程,每一項嘅合約同結算都唔同,唔可以合成一個「機場造價」。

三跑道系統嘅落成日期未在志錄出現。志錄收到動工同司法覆核裁決,但冇收錄系統全面啟用嘅一日,所以本篇只寫「動工」,唔寫「已完成」。

啟德舊址後來嘅用途(包括郵輪碼頭同住宅)屬另一條線,涉及城市規劃同土地開發,唔喺呢篇補齊。

未解與缺口

  • 客運量、貨運量同航班架次未逐年核實,本篇唔作跨年比較。
  • 機場核心計劃嘅造價、超支同財務安排未逐項核實,唔合成一個總數。
  • 三跑道系統嘅全面啟用日期未在志錄登記,所以只寫動工,唔寫落成。
  • 啟德舊址後來嘅郵輪碼頭同住宅發展屬另一條線,本篇唔補。

文獻點讀

  • 《香港志·總述 大事記》(公元前 5000 年至 2017 年,共 6,500 多條大事)p.216、p.222、p.231、p.250、p.259、p.313、p.329、p.366、p.480、p.525、p.565、p.751啟德至赤鱲角嘅精確日期主線:計劃被否決、跑道同客運大廈、施政報告、臨時機管局、貨運專營權同啟用日。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·自然》自然環境p.381新機場選址同氣象研究嘅記載,用嚟核對 1978 年拍板同啟用後嘅氣象服務交接。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·自然》環境保護與生態保育p.323、p.514、p.579三跑道環評司法覆核、啟德停運同填海動工嘅環境角度記載。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·自然》建置與地區概況(人口)p.111、p.673玫瑰園計劃嘅正式名稱同三跑道方案嘅決定,用嚟核對兩個關鍵名詞。官方/出版者網址

頁碼係電子書頁碼;同一本書不同版次可能移位。引用時請連書名、卷冊同頁碼一齊寫。

English

1. Before Kai Tak: a rejected plan, an airport all the same

In 1925 the Hong Kong Government proposed the Kai Tak Bund airport, but the British Committee of Imperial Defence rejected it on the ground that it breached the 1922 Washington Convention’s rule against new air force bases in East Asia. The rejection shows what an airport was at first: not a transport facility but a military one, permitted or refused according to international armaments arrangements rather than local need.

Four years later the main facilities of Kai Tak were completed and began operating for both military and civil purposes; in the same year the Harbour Office was appointed Director of Air Services. Between a rejected plan and a working airport lay a compromise: dual military and civil use.

The start of civil aviation can be dated to a day: on 24 March 1936 an Imperial Airways aircraft named Dorado flew from Penang to Hong Kong, the first civil airliner to land at Kai Tak and use its civil hangar. On 23 October the same year Pan American’s seaplane Philippine Clipper completed its first trans-Pacific flight and landed at Kai Tak. Scheduled services and long-haul routes were connected in that order.

2. Occupation and after: runway, tower and terminal

Under the Japanese occupation Kai Tak was planned as a regional hub. On 10 September 1942 the occupation government held a groundbreaking ceremony at Ngau Chi Wan for the airport’s expansion, aiming to make it a key civil and military aviation centre for East and Southeast Asia.

After the war civil aviation needed a dedicated department. In 1946 the Civil Aviation Department was formally established, taking over civil aviation matters at Kai Tak from the Harbour Office. Moving from an aviation sideline of the Harbour Office to an independent civil aviation authority made aviation a profession in its own right.

The hardware expanded step by step. On 12 September 1958 Runway 13/31 came into operation at a cost of $90 million; on the same day the airport was renamed Hong Kong International Airport. On 2 November 1962 the new passenger terminal was completed and opened, entering operation on the 12th of the same month. Runway and terminal together turned “able to land” into “able to handle many passengers at once”.

3. The jet age: a capacity ceiling

On 11 April 1970 a Pan American Boeing 747 flew from Tokyo to Kai Tak, the first visit to Hong Kong by what was then the world’s largest passenger aircraft; the next day it carried Hong Kong’s first batch of passengers via Japan to San Francisco. Larger aircraft raised demands on runway length, taxiways and terminal capacity at the same time.

Kai Tak’s limit was not its equipment but its position: the runway reached into Kowloon Bay with dense buildings all around, and aircraft descended low over the city. The spectacle became part of Hong Kong’s identity, but it also meant little room for noise relief, safety margins or expansion.

In 1978 the Hong Kong government decided to site the new airport at Chek Lap Kok. The decision did not start construction; it fixed the location first. Once the move was settled, all subsequent planning — flight paths, reclamation, road links — had to be rearranged around an airport that did not yet exist.

4. The Rose Garden: from decision to opening

On 12 October 1988 Governor David Wilson proposed in his policy address a new international airport at Chek Lap Kok to replace Kai Tak. In 1989 the Government announced a construction programme called the Rose Garden Project, officially the Hong Kong Airport Core Programme. The name matters: the airport was not a single works project but a group of core projects.

Institutions had to come first. In 1990 Hong Kong passed and implemented the Provisional Airport Authority Ordinance, with the Provisional Airport Authority responsible for planning, designing and building the new airport. A statutory body, then construction contracts, is the fixed order for large infrastructure.

Cargo needed its own arrangement. On 30 June 1995 the Chinese and British sides awarded the new airport’s air cargo franchise to two companies, Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited and Asia Airfreight Terminal Company Limited. Passenger business is counted in flights and cargo in terminals; handling the franchises separately shows that air freight is an industry of its own in Hong Kong.

On 6 July 1998 Hong Kong International Airport at Chek Lap Kok came into service and Kai Tak ceased operation the same day. The move was completed within one day, with no overlap. That is precisely why any failure would be visible at once: on 21 July the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region set up a commission of inquiry into the new airport’s operation and the causes of its problems.

5. The third runway: from option to reclamation

Fourteen years after opening, the airport needed to expand again. On 20 March 2012 the Chief Executive in Council approved the Airport Authority’s proposal and adopted the three-runway option. Going from two runways to three is not simply adding a strip: it requires new reclamation, a new concourse and new flight paths.

On 1 August 2016 the Airport Authority began reclamation for the Three-Runway System. Reclamation drew the most attention because it alters the seabed and the water, making environmental assessment and ecological compensation central to approval. On 22 December 2016 the court refused the judicial review brought by two applicants against the third runway’s environmental impact assessment.

Read the three dates together and the standard procedure for major infrastructure appears: the Executive Council settles the option, works begin, and judicial review may still be decided after work has started. That order does not mean the dispute is resolved; it means the procedure has run.

6. What remains unfinished

This dossier adds no passenger, cargo or aircraft movement figures. The three are compiled on different definitions and publication cycles, and checking them would require year-by-year Airport Authority reports and official statistics that this site has not verified.

The cost, overruns and financing of the Airport Core Programme are also left blank: the Rose Garden involved many separate projects, each with its own contracts and settlements, and they cannot be combined into a single “airport cost”.

The completion date of the Three-Runway System does not appear in the chronicle. The record reaches the start of works and the judicial review ruling, but not the day the system fully opened, so this dossier says construction began and does not say it was completed.

Later uses of the Kai Tak site, including the cruise terminal and housing, belong to another thread involving urban planning and land development, and are not completed here.

Gaps

  • Passenger, cargo and aircraft movement figures are not verified year by year, so no cross-year comparison is made.
  • The cost, overruns and financing of the Airport Core Programme are not verified item by item and are not combined into one total.
  • The full opening date of the Three-Runway System is not registered in the chronicle, so only the start of works is stated.
  • Later cruise terminal and housing development on the Kai Tak site belongs to another thread and is not completed here.

相關頁

引用本篇:請連標題、網址同「香港紀事館深度專題」一齊寫;時間線內每條條目仍以原書頁碼為準。

↑