Long-form / 深度專題

電力與能源:由街燈到管制協議

Electricity and energy: from street lamps to the Scheme of Control

香港嘅電力同燃氣供應係幾時開始,政府又用咩方法規管?

香港嘅能源故事由街燈開始:煤氣先照亮中環,港燈再把電燈點起,中電隨後供電九龍。兩間電力公司、一個跨境電網、一座核電站,加上一份又一份管制協議,構成今日嘅結構。每一次燃料轉換,都同時係一次政治決定。

約 4 分鐘 · 6 節 · 20 條時間線 · 3 份文獻

黑白照片:一幢單層廠房,屋頂後方豎起煙囪,正面是一列拱窗,門前是碎石路;右邊遠處有另一幢兩層洋樓,路旁豎著電線杆。
約 1903 至 1908 年,中華電力在紅磡漆咸道的發電廠。China Light and Power’s power station on Chatham Road, Hung Hom, between about 1903 and 1908.刊於 1908 年《Twentieth Century Impressions of Hong Kong》(Arnold Wright 編)。Commons 說明指該廠 1903 年投產、發電容量 75kW;拍攝者不詳。 · 歷史照片,經 Wikimedia Commons 取得 · Public domain Commons 檔案頁 sha1 0a312ff3bfb2…

繁體中文

一、煤氣與電力:兩間公司,兩個城市

1864 年 12 月 3 日,煤氣公司投入運作,中環 500 盞街燈經由全長 24 公里嘅管道獲得燃氣供應。呢個系統嘅目的很實際:街道要有人行夜路,就要有燈;有燈,城市活動才可以延長到晚上。

電力遲二十幾年才出現。1890 年 12 月 1 日,香港電燈公司於下午六時開始供電,使中環區域點亮香港首批以電力驅動嘅街燈。由煤氣燈到電燈,市區夜空嘅顏色改變,亦代表能源由燃燒轉向發電。

九龍嘅電力由另一間公司負責。1901 年 1 月 25 日,中華電力有限公司完成註冊;其位於紅磡德輔道(今漆咸道)嘅首座發電廠,自 1903 年起向九龍半島輸電。港島同九龍各有電力公司,呢個「兩間公司、兩個市場」嘅格局一直延續到今日。

二、戰時與戰後:停電、電網與工業

供電系統越集中,越怕中斷。1940 年 2 月 26 日,中華電力公司位於紅磡嘅鶴園發電廠正式啟用,九龍嘅發電能力集中喺一個廠房。四年之後,1944 年 8 月 20 日,由於燃料短缺,香港全境電力與煤氣停止供應。呢一日說明:能源系統嘅弱點唔在電線,而在燃料。

戰後嘅工作係把電網擴展到未接駁嘅地方。1957 年,中電在大嶼山完成環島輸電網絡嘅建設,使該島獲得可靠嘅電力供應。離島由自備發電機轉向電網,係鄉郊生活改變嘅物質條件。

三、石油危機與跨境聯網

1973 年嘅石油危機令能源變成國安級問題。同年 12 月 9 日生效嘅規例,授權政府對煤氣及電力之供應作出監管。呢一步嘅意義唔止係「管制價格」,而係確認電力同燃氣係必需品:政府要可以在必要時介入供應。

六年之後,香港第一次把電送到境外。1979 年 3 月 31 日,兩地代表於葵涌中華電力控制中心共同主持按鈕儀式,自此該公司每天向廣東省輸送 100 萬度電力。供電方向係「香港輸出」,同後來「內地輸入天然氣」啱啱相反;同一條邊界,可以雙向流動。

四、大亞灣:跨境核電與反對運動

1982 年 12 月 13 日,國務院常務會議確定,於廣東大亞灣建設核電站。電站在香港境外,但距離香港市區唔遠,所以由選址開始就唔只係內地嘅工程問題。

反對運動亦係跨境嘅。1986 年 8 月 20 日,香港一個爭取停建大亞灣核電廠嘅聯席會議,收集到 104 萬名香港居民簽名,並由 12 名代表將請願書遞交國務院港澳辦。呢個數字說明,能源設施嘅選址可以動員全社會,而唔止受影響嘅居民。

工程照樣推進。1987 年 8 月 7 日,大亞灣核電站嘅主體工程正式展開。1994 年 2 月 1 日,一號機組開始運行;同年 5 月 6 日,二號機組開始投入商業運作。由確定選址到兩台機組投產,時間橫跨十二年——大型能源項目的時間尺度,同政治爭議嘅節奏完全唔同。

五、天然氣與管制協議

燃料轉換係一步一步嚟。1996 年,中華電力所屬嘅龍鼓灘發電廠開始營運,發電燃料亦轉為天然氣。由燃煤轉天然氣,減低咗二氧化硫同懸浮粒子,但同時把供應鏈由本地存煤變成跨境管道,能源安全嘅定義亦隨之改變。

政府亦開始把可再生能源寫入目標。2005 年,香港政府發表首份可持續發展策略,訂下 2012 年可再生能源佔總用電量 1% 至 2% 嘅目標。呢個目標嘅作用,係為後來嘅上網電價同太陽能設施提供一個參照點。

天然氣供應要靠長期協議。2008 年 8 月 28 日,香港特別行政區政府聯同國家能源局簽署諒解備忘錄,約定自 2008 年起二十年內,內地向香港供應天然氣。2012 年 12 月 19 日,西氣東輸二線香港支線落成啟用,天然氣經深圳大鏟島分輸壓氣站輸往龍鼓灘發電廠。

電力公司本身亦受協議規管。2017 年 4 月 25 日,特區政府與中電及港燈簽署新《管制計劃協議》,協議年期 15 年,準許利潤回報率降至 8%。同月,政府聯同兩間電力公司所簽訂嘅協議推行上網電價制度,讓可再生能源發電可以接駁電網並按價收購。

接收設施仍未夠。2020 年 12 月,海上液化天然氣接收站嘅建造工作啟動。由管道到海上接收站,代表香港唔再只依賴一條跨境管道,而係建立一個可以接收海運液化天然氣嘅節點。

六、未完成的部分

本篇唔補逐年發電燃料組合比例。燃煤、天然氣同核電各佔幾多,要逐年對照兩間電力公司同政府統計,而口徑(本地發電同輸入電力)唔同,唔可以混算。

電費同燃料調整費亦留白。電費包含基本電費、燃料調整費同政府徵費,每一項嘅調整機制唔同,唔可以只講一個「電費升跌」。

停電事故同供電可靠度未逐年登記。本篇只寫 1944 年全境停電,唔把個別地區事故合成一條趨勢。

大亞灣輸港電量同核廢料安排未逐項核實;前者涉及年度結算,後者涉及內地處理安排,兩者都唔在已登記條目之內。

可再生能源實際佔比、上網電價嘅收購量同參與者數目未逐年收錄,所以本篇只寫目標同制度,唔寫成效。

未解與缺口

  • 逐年發電燃料組合比例未核實,本地發電同輸入電力口徑唔同,唔可以混算。
  • 電費同燃料調整費嘅組成同歷次調整未逐年登記,唔寫單一「電費升跌」。
  • 停電事故同供電可靠度未逐年收錄,只寫 1944 年全境停電。
  • 大亞灣輸港電量同核廢料安排未逐項核實。
  • 可再生能源實際佔比、上網電價收購量同參與者數目未逐年登記,只寫目標同制度。

文獻點讀

  • 《香港志·總述 大事記》(公元前 5000 年至 2017 年,共 6,500 多條大事)p.151、p.176、p.187、p.239、p.254、p.311、p.390、p.421、p.467、p.515、p.713煤氣、港燈、中電、停電、跨境輸電同管制協議嘅精確日期主線。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·自然》環境保護與生態保育p.233、p.327、p.547、p.548、p.549、p.550、p.566燃料轉換同大亞灣工程嘅環境記載,用嚟核對天然氣同核電嘅時點。官方/出版者網址
  • 《香港志·自然》自然資源與生態p.82、p.87可再生能源目標同管制計劃協議推行上網電價嘅記載。官方/出版者網址

頁碼係電子書頁碼;同一本書不同版次可能移位。引用時請連書名、卷冊同頁碼一齊寫。

English

1. Gas and electricity: two companies, two cities

On 3 December 1864 the gas company began operating, supplying 500 street lamps in Central through 24 kilometres of pipe. The purpose was practical: streets needed light for people walking at night, and with light the city’s activity could extend into the evening.

Electricity came more than two decades later. On 1 December 1890 Hongkong Electric began supplying power at six in the evening, lighting Hong Kong’s first electric street lamps in Central. From gas lamp to electric lamp, the colour of the night sky changed, and energy shifted from burning to generation.

Kowloon’s supply came from another company. On 25 January 1901 China Light and Power completed registration; its first power station at Des Voeux Road in Hung Hom, now Chatham Road, supplied the Kowloon Peninsula from 1903. The island and Kowloon each had a power company, a two-company, two-market structure that persists.

2. War and after: blackouts, grids and industry

The more centralised a supply system, the more it fears interruption. On 26 February 1940 China Light and Power’s Hok Un Power Station in Hung Hom opened, concentrating Kowloon’s generating capacity in one plant. Four years later, on 20 August 1944, fuel shortages stopped electricity and gas supplies throughout Hong Kong. That day showed where the weakness lay: not in the wires but in the fuel.

Post-war work extended the grid to places not yet connected. In 1957 China Light and Power completed a ring transmission network on Lantau, giving the island a reliable supply. Moving from private generators to the grid was a material condition for change in rural life.

3. The oil crisis and a cross-border grid

The oil crisis of 1973 turned energy into a question of national security. Regulations effective 9 December that year authorised the Government to regulate the supply of gas and electricity. The point was not only price control but recognition that power and gas are necessities the Government must be able to step in to protect.

Six years later Hong Kong first sent electricity beyond its boundary. On 31 March 1979 representatives of the two sides pressed the button together at China Light and Power’s control centre in Kwai Chung, after which the company supplied one million units of electricity a day to Guangdong. The flow was outward from Hong Kong, the reverse of later gas imports from the mainland: the same border can carry flows both ways.

4. Daya Bay: cross-border nuclear power and opposition

On 13 December 1982 the State Council’s executive meeting decided to build a nuclear power station at Daya Bay in Guangdong. The station lay outside Hong Kong but close to the city, so from the siting stage it was more than a mainland engineering question.

Opposition was cross-border too. On 20 August 1986 a joint conference campaigning to stop the plant collected 1.04 million signatures from Hong Kong residents, and 12 representatives submitted a petition to the State Council’s Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office. The number shows that siting an energy facility can mobilise a whole society, not only the residents next door.

Construction went ahead. On 7 August 1987 the main works at Daya Bay began. On 1 February 1994 the first unit started operating, and on 6 May the second unit entered commercial operation. From siting decision to two operating units took twelve years — a timescale utterly different from the rhythm of political controversy.

5. Natural gas and control agreements

Fuel switching came step by step. In 1996 China Light and Power’s Black Point Power Station began operating and the fuel for generation switched to natural gas. Moving from coal to gas cut sulphur dioxide and particulates, but it also turned the supply chain from locally stored coal into a cross-border pipeline, changing what energy security meant.

The Government also began writing renewables into targets. In 2005 it published Hong Kong’s first sustainable development strategy, setting a target of 1 to 2 per cent of total electricity consumption from renewable energy by 2012. The target gave later feed-in tariffs and solar installations a reference point.

Gas supply depends on long-term agreements. On 28 August 2008 the Government and the National Energy Administration signed a memorandum of understanding for the mainland to supply natural gas to Hong Kong for twenty years from 2008. On 19 December 2012 the Hong Kong branch of the West-East Gas Pipeline II was commissioned, carrying gas through the Shenzhen Dachen Island station to Black Point.

The power companies themselves are governed by agreement. On 25 April 2017 the Government signed new Schemes of Control with CLP and Hongkong Electric for 15 years, with the permitted rate of return lowered to 8 per cent. That month the agreements introduced a feed-in tariff, allowing renewable generation to connect to the grid and be bought at a set rate.

Receiving capacity was still short. In December 2020 construction began on an offshore liquefied natural gas receiving station. From pipeline to offshore terminal, Hong Kong moved beyond reliance on a single cross-border pipe towards a node that can receive seaborne LNG.

6. What remains unfinished

This dossier adds no year-by-year fuel mix. How much comes from coal, gas and nuclear requires annual comparison of the two companies and government statistics, and the definitions — local generation versus imported power — differ, so they cannot be added.

Tariffs and fuel adjustment charges are left blank too. A bill contains the basic tariff, the fuel adjustment and government charges, each adjusted by a different mechanism, so a single “tariff rise or fall” cannot be stated.

Blackout incidents and supply reliability are not registered annually. Only the territory-wide cut of 1944 is stated, and local incidents are not combined into a trend.

Power delivered from Daya Bay to Hong Kong and arrangements for nuclear waste are not verified item by item: the first involves annual settlement and the second mainland handling arrangements, neither of which is in the registered entries.

Actual renewable shares, feed-in tariff volumes and participant numbers are not recorded annually, so this dossier states targets and institutions only, not results.

Gaps

  • The annual fuel mix is not verified; local generation and imported power use different definitions and cannot be added together.
  • The composition of tariffs and fuel adjustment charges, and each adjustment, are not registered annually, so no single “tariff rise or fall” is stated.
  • Blackout incidents and supply reliability are not recorded annually; only the territory-wide cut of 1944 is given.
  • Power delivered from Daya Bay and nuclear waste arrangements are not verified item by item.
  • Actual renewable shares, feed-in tariff volumes and participant numbers are not registered annually; only targets and institutions are stated.

相關頁

引用本篇:請連標題、網址同「香港紀事館深度專題」一齊寫;時間線內每條條目仍以原書頁碼為準。

↑